From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f70.google.com (mail-pg0-f70.google.com [74.125.83.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D1E6B03E9 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 04:58:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f70.google.com with SMTP id u12so36451136pgo.4 for ; Tue, 09 May 2017 01:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [65.50.211.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l191si2119686pge.251.2017.05.09.01.58.27 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 May 2017 01:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 01:58:25 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] hugetlbfs 'noautofill' mount option Message-ID: <20170509085825.GB32555@infradead.org> References: <326e38dd-b4a8-e0ca-6ff7-af60e8045c74@oracle.com> <7ff6fb32-7d16-af4f-d9d5-698ab7e9e14b@intel.com> <03127895-3c5a-5182-82de-3baa3116749e@oracle.com> <22557bf3-14bb-de02-7b1b-a79873c583f1@intel.com> <7677d20e-5d53-1fb7-5dac-425edda70b7b@oracle.com> <48a544c4-61b3-acaf-0386-649f073602b6@intel.com> <476ea1b6-36d1-bc86-fa99-b727e3c2650d@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <476ea1b6-36d1-bc86-fa99-b727e3c2650d@oracle.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "prakash.sangappa" Cc: Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:12:42PM -0700, prakash.sangappa wrote: > Regarding #3 as a general feature, do we want to > consider this and the complexity associated with the > implementation? We have to. Given that no one has exclusive access to hugetlbfs a mount option is fundamentally the wrong interface. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org