From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f69.google.com (mail-pg0-f69.google.com [74.125.83.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F076B02E1 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:01:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f69.google.com with SMTP id 72so26889307pge.10 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.156.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s74si21434595pfs.386.2017.04.25.01.00.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v3P7wxYt144678 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:00:58 -0400 Received: from e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.109]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2a22cdrkq2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:00:57 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp13.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:00:55 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:00:48 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: Review request: draft ioctl_userfaultfd(2) manual page References: <487b2c79-f99b-6d0f-2412-aa75cde65569@gmail.com> <9af29fc6-dce2-f729-0f07-a0bfcc6c3587@gmail.com> <20170322135423.GB27789@rapoport-lnx> <20170421110714.GC20569@rapoport-lnx> <4c05c2bb-af77-d706-9455-8ceaa5510580@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4c05c2bb-af77-d706-9455-8ceaa5510580@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20170425080047.GA16770@rapoport-lnx> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , linux-man Hello Michael, On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:41:18PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hi Mike, > [...] > > > > Yes. > > Just the future is only a week or two from today as we are at 4.11-rc7 :) > > Yes, I understand :-). So of course there's a *lot* more > new stuff to document, right? I've started to add the description of the new functionality to both userfaultfd.2 and ioctl_userfaultfd.2 and it's somewhat difficult for me to decide how it would be better to split the information between these two pages and what should be the pages internal structure. I even thought about possibility of adding relatively comprehensive description of userfaultfd as man7/userfaultfd.7 and then keeping the pages in man2 relatively small, just with brief description of APIs and SEE ALSO pointing to man7. Any advise is highly appreciated. > [...] -- Sincerely yours, Mike. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org