From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/madvise: Move up the behavior parameter validation
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 05:27:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170417052729.GA23423@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170414135141.15340-1-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 07:21:41PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> The madvise_behavior_valid() function should be called before
> acting upon the behavior parameter. Hence move up the function.
> This also includes MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE and MADV_HWPOISON options
> as valid behavior parameter for the system call madvise().
>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
>
> Added CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE check before using MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE
> and MADV_HWPOISONE constants.
>
> mm/madvise.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index efd4721..ccff186 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -694,6 +694,10 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
> #endif
> case MADV_DONTDUMP:
> case MADV_DODUMP:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> + case MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE:
> + case MADV_HWPOISON:
> +#endif
> return true;
>
> default:
> @@ -767,12 +771,13 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
> size_t len;
> struct blk_plug plug;
>
> + if (!madvise_behavior_valid(behavior))
> + return error;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> if (behavior == MADV_HWPOISON || behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE)
> return madvise_inject_error(behavior, start, start + len_in);
> #endif
> - if (!madvise_behavior_valid(behavior))
> - return error;
Hi Anshuman,
I'm wondering why current code calls madvise_inject_error() at the beginning
of SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise), without any boundary checks of address or length.
I agree to checking madvise_behavior_valid for MADV_{HWPOISON,SOFT_OFFLINE},
but checking boundary of other arguments is also helpful, so how about moving
down the existing #ifdef block like below?
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index a09d2d3dfae9..7b36912e1f4a 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -754,10 +754,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise, unsigned long, start, size_t, len_in, int, behavior)
size_t len;
struct blk_plug plug;
-#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
- if (behavior == MADV_HWPOISON || behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE)
- return madvise_inject_error(behavior, start, start+len_in);
-#endif
if (!madvise_behavior_valid(behavior))
return error;
@@ -777,6 +773,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise, unsigned long, start, size_t, len_in, int, behavior)
if (end == start)
return error;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
+ if (behavior == MADV_HWPOISON || behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE)
+ return madvise_inject_error(behavior, start, start+len_in);
+#endif
+
write = madvise_need_mmap_write(behavior);
if (write) {
if (down_write_killable(¤t->mm->mmap_sem))
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-17 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-13 9:20 [PATCH] " Anshuman Khandual
2017-04-13 13:59 ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-14 13:51 ` [PATCH V2] " Anshuman Khandual
2017-04-17 5:27 ` Naoya Horiguchi [this message]
2017-04-18 2:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-04-18 5:28 ` [PATCH V3] " Anshuman Khandual
2017-04-18 21:01 ` David Rientjes
2017-04-19 0:46 ` Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170417052729.GA23423@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox