From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f198.google.com (mail-wr0-f198.google.com [209.85.128.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9A46B03AE for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:58:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f198.google.com with SMTP id w96so25678966wrb.13 for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com. [148.163.158.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r13si157043wrr.241.2017.04.03.12.58.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v33JwUcw121698 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:58:40 -0400 Received: from e19.ny.us.ibm.com (e19.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.209]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29kubncaa6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:58:40 -0400 Received: from localhost by e19.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:58:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:58:30 -0500 From: Reza Arbab Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] mm: make movable onlining suck less References: <20170330115454.32154-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <20170403115545.GK24661@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170403115545.GK24661@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-Id: <20170403195830.64libncet5l6vuvb@arbab-laptop> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , Andrea Arcangeli , Yasuaki Ishimatsu , Tang Chen , qiuxishi@huawei.com, Kani Toshimitsu , slaoub@gmail.com, Joonsoo Kim , Andi Kleen , Zhang Zhen , David Rientjes , Daniel Kiper , Igor Mammedov , Vitaly Kuznetsov , LKML , Chris Metcalf , Dan Williams , Heiko Carstens , Lai Jiangshan , Martin Schwidefsky On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:55:46PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: >Anyting? I would really appreciate a feedback from IBM and Futjitsu >guys who have shaped this code last few years. Also Igor and Vitaly >seem to be using memory hotplug in virtualized environments. I do not >expect they would see a huge advantage of the rework but I would >appreciate to give it some testing to catch any potential regressions. Sorry for the delayed reply. With this set, I'm able to "online_movable" blocks in ascending order. However, I am seeing a regression. When adding memory to a memoryless node, it shows up in node 0 instead. I'm digging to see if I can help narrow down where things go wrong. -- Reza Arbab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org