From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM,ATTEND] shared TLB, hugetlb reservations
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 18:57:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403165706.GR24661@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c03e2254-4829-d872-d6f0-ed5d1a22ce89@oracle.com>
On Mon 03-04-17 09:24:52, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 04/03/2017 04:51 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 08-03-17 17:30:55, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >> On 01/10/2017 03:02 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> >>> Another more concrete topic is hugetlb reservations. Michal Hocko
> >>> proposed the topic "mm patches review bandwidth", and brought up the
> >>> related subject of areas in need of attention from an architectural
> >>> POV. I suggested that hugetlb reservations was one such area. I'm
> >>> guessing it was introduced to solve a rather concrete problem. However,
> >>> over time additional hugetlb functionality was added and the
> >>> capabilities of the reservation code was stretched to accommodate.
> >>> It would be good to step back and take a look at the design of this
> >>> code to determine if a rewrite/redesign is necessary. Michal suggested
> >>> documenting the current design/code as a first step. If people think
> >>> this is worth discussion at the summit, I could put together such a
> >>> design before the gathering.
> >>
> >> I attempted to put together a design/overview of how hugetlb reservations
> >> currently work. Hopefully, this will be useful.
> >
> > I am still too busy to read through this carefuly and provide a useful
> > feedback but I believe this should go int Documentation/vm/hugetlb$foo
> > file. Care to send it as a patch please?
>
> Sure
>
> There is some incomplete information in the document, so I will make
> some revisions and then send out as patch later this week.
Thanks a lot. This is highly appreciated!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-10 23:02 [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM,ATTEND] shared TLB, hugetln reservations Mike Kravetz
2017-01-12 14:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-09 1:30 ` [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM,ATTEND] shared TLB, hugetlb reservations Mike Kravetz
2017-03-14 18:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-03-17 22:13 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-04-03 11:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-03 16:24 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-04-03 16:57 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403165706.GR24661@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox