From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hpa@zytor.com,
chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, hch@lst.de, mingo@elte.hu,
jszhang@marvell.com, joelaf@google.com, joaodias@google.com,
willy@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, thellstrom@vmware.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to call vfree() in atomic context
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 13:27:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330102719.13119-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
Commit 5803ed292e63 ("mm: mark all calls into the vmalloc subsystem
as potentially sleeping") added might_sleep() to remove_vm_area() from
vfree(), and commit 763b218ddfaf ("mm: add preempt points into
__purge_vmap_area_lazy()") actually made vfree() potentially sleeping.
This broke vmwgfx driver which calls vfree() under spin_lock().
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:1480
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 341, name: plymouthd
2 locks held by plymouthd/341:
#0: (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc01c274b>] drm_release+0x3b/0x3b0 [drm]
#1: (&(&tfile->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffc0173038>] ttm_object_file_release+0x28/0x90 [ttm]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x86/0xc3
___might_sleep+0x17d/0x250
__might_sleep+0x4a/0x80
remove_vm_area+0x22/0x90
__vunmap+0x2e/0x110
vfree+0x42/0x90
kvfree+0x2c/0x40
drm_ht_remove+0x1a/0x30 [drm]
ttm_object_file_release+0x50/0x90 [ttm]
vmw_postclose+0x47/0x60 [vmwgfx]
drm_release+0x290/0x3b0 [drm]
__fput+0xf8/0x210
____fput+0xe/0x10
task_work_run+0x85/0xc0
exit_to_usermode_loop+0xb4/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x185/0x1f0
entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
This can be fixed in vmgfx, but it would be better to make vfree()
non-sleeping again because we may have other bugs like this one.
__purge_vmap_area_lazy() is the only function in the vfree() path that
wants to be able to sleep. So it make sense to schedule
__purge_vmap_area_lazy() via schedule_work() so it runs only in sleepable
context. This will have a minimal effect on the regular vfree() path.
since __purge_vmap_area_lazy() is rarely called.
Fixes: 5803ed292e63 ("mm: mark all calls into the vmalloc subsystem as
potentially sleeping")
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 68eb002..ea1b4ab 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static bool __purge_vmap_area_lazy(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
* Kick off a purge of the outstanding lazy areas. Don't bother if somebody
* is already purging.
*/
-static void try_purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
+static void try_purge_vmap_area_lazy(struct work_struct *work)
{
if (mutex_trylock(&vmap_purge_lock)) {
__purge_vmap_area_lazy(ULONG_MAX, 0);
@@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ static void purge_vmap_area_lazy(void)
mutex_unlock(&vmap_purge_lock);
}
+static DECLARE_WORK(purge_vmap_work, try_purge_vmap_area_lazy);
+
/*
* Free a vmap area, caller ensuring that the area has been unmapped
* and flush_cache_vunmap had been called for the correct range
@@ -736,7 +738,7 @@ static void free_vmap_area_noflush(struct vmap_area *va)
llist_add(&va->purge_list, &vmap_purge_list);
if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages()))
- try_purge_vmap_area_lazy();
+ schedule_work(&purge_vmap_work);
}
/*
@@ -1125,7 +1127,6 @@ void vm_unmap_ram(const void *mem, unsigned int count)
unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)mem;
struct vmap_area *va;
- might_sleep();
BUG_ON(!addr);
BUG_ON(addr < VMALLOC_START);
BUG_ON(addr > VMALLOC_END);
@@ -1477,8 +1478,6 @@ struct vm_struct *remove_vm_area(const void *addr)
{
struct vmap_area *va;
- might_sleep();
-
va = find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
if (va && va->flags & VM_VM_AREA) {
struct vm_struct *vm = va->vm;
--
2.10.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 10:27 Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2017-03-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-31 8:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] kernel/fork: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() to free thread stack Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-30 10:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/vmalloc: remove vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-30 17:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-30 15:27 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-04 9:40 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-30 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow to call vfree() in atomic context Thomas Hellstrom
2017-03-30 14:48 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-03-30 15:04 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2017-04-04 9:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 9:49 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2017-04-05 10:31 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-05 10:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-05 11:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-04-05 12:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-30 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2017-03-31 7:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-03-31 9:26 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-04 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 9:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/vmalloc: " Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/ldt: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] kernel/fork: use vfree() instead of vfree_atomic() to free thread stack Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/vmalloc: remove vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2017-04-12 12:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/vmalloc: Don't spawn workers if somebody already purging Andrey Ryabinin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170330102719.13119-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--to=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joaodias@google.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox