From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com>,
Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: in_irq_or_nmi()
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:19:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170329091949.o2kozhhdnszgwvtn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329105928.609bc581@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:59:28AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:12:19 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:58:17AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 05:15:00PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > > And I also verified it worked:
> > > >
> > > > 0.63 a?? mov __preempt_count,%eax
> > > > a?? free_hot_cold_page():
> > > > 1.25 a?? test $0x1f0000,%eax
> > > > a?? a?? jne 1e4
> > > >
> > > > And this simplification also made the compiler change this into a
> > > > unlikely branch, which is a micro-optimization (that I will leave up to
> > > > the compiler).
> > >
> > > Excellent! That said, I think we should define in_irq_or_nmi() in
> > > preempt.h, rather than hiding it in the memory allocator. And since we're
> > > doing that, we might as well make it look like the other definitions:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/preempt.h b/include/linux/preempt.h
> > > index 7eeceac52dea..af98c29abd9d 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/preempt.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
> > > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@
> > > #define in_interrupt() (irq_count())
> > > #define in_serving_softirq() (softirq_count() & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET)
> > > #define in_nmi() (preempt_count() & NMI_MASK)
> > > +#define in_irq_or_nmi() (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | NMI_MASK))
> > > #define in_task() (!(preempt_count() & \
> > > (NMI_MASK | HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_OFFSET)))
> > >
> >
> > No, that's horrible. Also, wth is this about? A memory allocator that
> > needs in_nmi()? That sounds beyond broken.
>
> It is the other way around. We want to exclude NMI and HARDIRQ from
> using the per-cpu-pages (pcp) lists "order-0 cache" (they will
> fall-through using the normal buddy allocator path).
Any in_nmi() code arriving at the allocator is broken. No need to fix
the allocator.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <58b48b1f.F/jo2/WiSxvvGm/z%akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2017-03-01 13:48 ` Page allocator order-0 optimizations merged Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-01 17:36 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-22 17:39 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-22 23:40 ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-23 13:43 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-23 14:51 ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-26 8:21 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-26 10:17 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-27 7:32 ` Pankaj Gupta
2017-03-27 8:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-27 12:28 ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-27 12:39 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-27 13:32 ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-28 7:32 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-28 8:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-28 16:05 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-28 18:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-29 7:13 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-03-28 8:28 ` Pankaj Gupta
2017-03-27 14:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-27 15:15 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-27 16:58 ` in_irq_or_nmi() Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-29 8:12 ` in_irq_or_nmi() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-29 8:59 ` in_irq_or_nmi() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-29 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-03-29 18:12 ` in_irq_or_nmi() Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-29 19:11 ` in_irq_or_nmi() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-29 19:44 ` in_irq_or_nmi() and RFC patch Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-30 6:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-30 7:12 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-30 7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-30 9:46 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-03-30 13:04 ` Mel Gorman
2017-03-30 15:07 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-04-03 12:05 ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-05 8:53 ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-10 14:31 ` Page allocator order-0 optimizations merged zhong jiang
2017-04-10 15:10 ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-11 1:54 ` zhong jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170329091949.o2kozhhdnszgwvtn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=ttoukan.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox