From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670FB6B0390 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:53:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id u2so513761wmu.18 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i57si5309732wra.111.2017.03.28.09.53.52 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:53:43 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Message-ID: <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse> References: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting it. Michal? Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org