linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Thorlton <alex.thorlton@hpe.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Alex Thorlton <alex.thorlton@hpe.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ying Huang <ying.huang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: support parallel free of memory
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:15:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170320191536.GG196487@stormcage.americas.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170317022158.GB18964@aaronlu.sh.intel.com>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:21:58AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 02:38:44PM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:59:59PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > v2 changes: Nothing major, only minor ones.
> > >  - rebased on top of v4.11-rc2-mmotm-2017-03-14-15-41;
> > >  - use list_add_tail instead of list_add to add worker to tlb's worker
> > >    list so that when doing flush, the first queued worker gets flushed
> > >    first(based on the comsumption that the first queued worker has a
> > >    better chance of finishing its job than those later queued workers);
> > >  - use bool instead of int for variable free_batch_page in function
> > >    tlb_flush_mmu_free_batches;
> > >  - style change according to ./scripts/checkpatch;
> > >  - reword some of the changelogs to make it more readable.
> > > 
> > > v1 is here:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/24/245
> > 
> > I tested v1 on a Haswell system with 64 sockets/1024 cores/2048 threads
> > and 8TB of RAM, with a 1TB malloc.  The average free() time for a 1TB
> > malloc on a vanilla kernel was 41.69s, the patched kernel averaged
> > 21.56s for the same test.
> 
> Thanks a lot for the test result.
> 
> > 
> > I am testing v2 now and will report back with results in the next day or
> > so.
> 
> Testing plain v2 shouldn't bring any surprise/difference

You're right!  Not much difference here.  v2 averaged a 23.17s free
time for a 1T allocation.

> better set the
> following param before the test(I'm planning to make them default in the
> next version):
> # echo 64 > /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/batch_free_wq/max_active
> # echo 1030 > /sys/kernel/debug/parallel_free/max_gather_batch_count

10 test runs with these params set averaged 22.22s to free 1T.

So, we're still seeing a nearly 50% decrease in free time vs. the
unpatched kernel.

- Alex

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-20 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15  8:59 Aaron Lu
2017-03-15  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: add tlb_flush_mmu_free_batches Aaron Lu
2017-03-15  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm: parallel free pages Aaron Lu
2017-03-15  9:42   ` Hillf Danton
2017-03-15 11:54     ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-15  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: use a dedicated workqueue for the free workers Aaron Lu
2017-03-22  6:33   ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-22  8:41     ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-22  8:55       ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-22 13:43         ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-23  5:53           ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-23 15:38       ` Dave Hansen
2017-03-24 12:37         ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-15  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm: add force_free_pages in zap_pte_range Aaron Lu
2017-03-15  9:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm: add debugfs interface for parallel free tuning Aaron Lu
2017-03-15 14:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: support parallel free of memory Michal Hocko
2017-03-15 15:44   ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-15 16:28     ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-15 21:38       ` Tim Chen
2017-03-16  9:07         ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-16 18:36           ` Tim Chen
2017-03-17  7:47             ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17  8:07               ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-17 12:33               ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-17 12:59                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 13:16                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-17 12:53               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-17 13:05                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-21 14:54           ` Dave Hansen
2017-03-22  8:02             ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-24  7:04             ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-21 15:18           ` Tim Chen
2017-03-16  6:54       ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-16  7:34       ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-16 13:51         ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-16 14:14           ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-15 14:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-03-15 15:50   ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-17  3:10   ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-16 19:38 ` Alex Thorlton
2017-03-17  2:21   ` Aaron Lu
2017-03-20 19:15     ` Alex Thorlton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170320191536.GG196487@stormcage.americas.sgi.com \
    --to=alex.thorlton@hpe.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox