From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f198.google.com (mail-pf0-f198.google.com [209.85.192.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC376B038C for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:27:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f198.google.com with SMTP id x63so93924304pfx.7 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com. [192.55.52.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z4si5750142pge.359.2017.03.16.09.27.38 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:27:37 -0700 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [mmotm] "x86/atomic: move __arch_atomic_add_unless out of line" build error Message-ID: <20170316162737.GJ32070@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20170316044704.GA729@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , LKML > Andi, why did you completely remove __arch_atomic_add_unless() from > the header? Don't we need at least a declaration there? Yes the declaration should be there. I'll send a new patch. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org