From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com" <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com>,
"tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com" <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"daniel.kiper@oracle.com" <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
"xieyisheng1@huawei.com" <xieyisheng1@huawei.com>,
"iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
"qiuxishi@huawei.com" <qiuxishi@huawei.com>,
"yasu.isimatu@gmail.com" <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"imammedo@redhat.com" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
"rientjes@google.com" <rientjes@google.com>,
"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"slaoub@gmail.com" <slaoub@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rework memory hotplug onlining
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:54:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316085404.GE30501@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489622542.9118.8.camel@hpe.com>
On Wed 15-03-17 23:08:14, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 10:13 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> :
> > @@ -388,39 +389,44 @@ static ssize_t show_valid_zones(struct device
> > *dev,
> > struct device_attribute *attr, char
> > *buf)
> > {
> > struct memory_block *mem = to_memory_block(dev);
> > - unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> > - unsigned long valid_start, valid_end, valid_pages;
> > - unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION *
> > sections_per_block;
> > + unsigned long start_pfn, nr_pages;
> > + bool append = false;
> > struct zone *zone;
> > - int zone_shift = 0;
> > + int nid;
> >
> > start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr);
> > - end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
> > + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> > + nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;
> >
> > - /* The block contains more than one zone can not be
> > offlined. */
> > - if (!test_pages_in_a_zone(start_pfn, end_pfn, &valid_start,
> > &valid_end))
> > + /*
> > + * The block contains more than one zone can not be
> > offlined.
> > + * This can happen e.g. for ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
> > + */
> > + if (!test_pages_in_a_zone(start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages,
> > NULL, NULL))
> > return sprintf(buf, "none\n");
> >
> > - zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(valid_start));
>
> Please do not remove the fix made in a96dfddbcc043. zone needs to be
> set from valid_start, not from start_pfn.
Thanks for pointing this out. I was scratching my head about this part
but was too tired from previous git archeology so I didn't check the
history of this particular part.
I will restore the original behavior but before I do that I am really
curious whether partial memblocks are even supported for onlining. Maybe
I am missing something but I do not see any explicit checks for NULL
struct page when we set zone boundaries or online a memblock. Is it
possible those memblocks are just never hotplugable?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-15 9:13 Michal Hocko
2017-03-15 10:48 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-03-15 12:29 ` ZONE_NORMAL vs. ZONE_MOVABLE (was: Re: [RFC PATCH] rework memory hotplug onlining) Michal Hocko
2017-03-15 12:53 ` ZONE_NORMAL vs. ZONE_MOVABLE Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-03-15 13:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-15 16:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-03-16 5:31 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-03-16 19:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-03-17 10:25 ` Igor Mammedov
2017-03-20 6:33 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-03-30 7:55 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-03-15 23:08 ` [RFC PATCH] rework memory hotplug onlining Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-03-16 8:54 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-03-16 17:19 ` Kani, Toshimitsu
2017-03-16 17:40 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 13:20 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-21 14:09 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170316085404.GE30501@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
--cc=zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox