linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, david@fromorbit.com,
	apolyakov@beget.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] mm: Add memory allocation watchdog kernel thread.
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:45:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201703132245.FBC17698.VtLSFMFOOFOJQH@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170313094504.GH31518@dhcp22.suse.cz>

Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 11-03-17 10:46:58, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > In most cases, administrators can't capture even SysRq-t; let alone vmcore.
> > Therefore, automatic watchdog is highly appreciated. Have you considered this aspect?
> 
> yes I have. I tend to work with our SUSE L3 and enterprise customer a
> lot last 10 years. And what I claim is that adding more watchdog doesn't
> necessarily mean we will get better bug reports. I do not have any exact
> statistics but my perception is that allocation lockups tends to be less
> than 1% of reported bugs. You seem to make a huge issue from this
> particular class of issues basing your argumentation on "unknown
> issues which might have been allocation lockups etc." I am not feeling
> comfortable with this kind of arguing and making any decision on them.

Allocation lockups might be less than 1% of _reported_ bugs.
What I'm talking about is that there will be _unreported_ (and therefore
unrecognized/unsolved) bugs caused by memory allocation behavior.
You are refusing to make an attempt to prove/verify/handle it.

> 
> So let me repeat (for the last time). I find your watchdog interesting
> for stress testing but I am not convinced this is generally useful for
> real workloads and the maintenance burden is worth it. I _might_ be
> wrong here and that is why this is _no_ a NAK from me but I feel
> uncomfortable how hard you are pushing this.

If you worry about false positives and/or side effects of watchdog, you can
disable it in your distribution (i.e. SUSE). There are developers/users/customers
who will be helped by it.

> 
> I expect this is my last word on this.

After all, there is no real objection. Andrew, what do you think?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-13 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-28  1:21 Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-09 10:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-09 22:37   ` Andrew Morton
2017-03-10 10:40     ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-10 11:19       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-10 13:49         ` Brian Foster
2017-03-10 15:26         ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-11  1:46           ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-13  9:45             ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-13 13:45               ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2017-03-09 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2017-03-10 11:12   ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201703132245.FBC17698.VtLSFMFOOFOJQH@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apolyakov@beget.ru \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox