Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] staging: android: ion: Use CMA APIs directly

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 10:50:20AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 03/03/2017 08:41 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Laura,
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch.
> > 
> > On Thursday 02 Mar 2017 13:44:42 Laura Abbott wrote:
> >> When CMA was first introduced, its primary use was for DMA allocation
> >> and the only way to get CMA memory was to call dma_alloc_coherent. This
> >> put Ion in an awkward position since there was no device structure
> >> readily available and setting one up messed up the coherency model.
> >> These days, CMA can be allocated directly from the APIs. Switch to using
> >> this model to avoid needing a dummy device. This also avoids awkward
> >> caching questions.
> > 
> > If the DMA mapping API isn't suitable for today's requirements anymore, I 
> > believe that's what needs to be fixed, instead of working around the problem 
> > by introducing another use-case-specific API.
> > 
> 
> I don't think this is a usecase specific API. CMA has been decoupled from
> DMA already because it's used in other places. The trying to go through
> DMA was just another layer of abstraction, especially since there isn't
> a device available for allocation.

Also, we've had separation of allocation and dma-mapping since forever,
that's how it works almost everywhere. Not exactly sure why/how arm-soc
ecosystem ended up focused so much on dma_alloc_coherent.

I think separating allocation from dma mapping/coherency is perfectly
fine, and the way to go.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>