From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: simon.guinot@sequanux.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, gary.hook@amd.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, cl@linux.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, bhe@redhat.com, xemul@parallels.com,
joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
piotr.luc@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com,
ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, bp@suse.de, dyoung@redhat.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, jroedel@suse.de, keescook@chromium.org,
arnd@arndb.de, toshi.kani@hpe.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, luto@kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.o
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 19/32] crypto: ccp: Introduce the AMD Secure Processor device
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:39:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302173936.GC11970@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148846777589.2349.11698765767451886038.stgit@brijesh-build-machine>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:16:15AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> The CCP device is part of the AMD Secure Processor. In order to expand the
> usage of the AMD Secure Processor, create a framework that allows functional
> components of the AMD Secure Processor to be initialized and handled
> appropriately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/crypto/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/crypto/ccp/Kconfig | 43 +++--
> drivers/crypto/ccp/Makefile | 8 -
> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev-v3.c | 86 +++++-----
> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev-v5.c | 73 ++++-----
> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c | 137 +++++++++-------
> drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.h | 35 ----
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.c | 308 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h | 140 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c | 324 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-platform.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/ccp.h | 3
> 12 files changed, 1240 insertions(+), 195 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-dev.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-pci.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/crypto/ccp/sp-platform.c
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/Makefile b/drivers/crypto/ccp/Makefile
> index 346ceb8..8127e18 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/Makefile
> @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD) += ccp.o
> -ccp-objs := ccp-dev.o \
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SP_DD) += ccp.o
> +ccp-objs := sp-dev.o sp-platform.o
> +ccp-$(CONFIG_PCI) += sp-pci.o
> +ccp-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_CCP) += ccp-dev.o \
> ccp-ops.o \
> ccp-dev-v3.o \
> ccp-dev-v5.o \
> - ccp-platform.o \
> ccp-dmaengine.o
It looks like ccp-platform.c has morphed into sp-platform.c (judging by
the compatible string and general shape of the code), and the original
ccp-platform.c is no longer built.
Shouldn't ccp-platform.c be deleted by this patch?
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 15:12 [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/32] x86: Add the Secure Encrypted Virtualization CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 21:01 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-04 10:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-06 18:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-06 20:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/32] KVM: SVM: prepare for new bit definition in nested_ctl Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/32] KVM: SVM: Add SEV feature definitions to KVM Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 0:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/32] x86: Use encrypted access of BOOT related data with SEV Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 19:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/32] x86/pci: Use memremap when walking setup data Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 20:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-07 0:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-13 20:08 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/32] x86/efi: Access EFI data as encrypted when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 11:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/32] x86: Use PAGE_KERNEL protection for ioremap of memory page Brijesh Singh
2017-03-07 14:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 20:04 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:32 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-17 14:55 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-02 15:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/32] x86: Change early_ioremap to early_memremap for BOOT data Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 8:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/32] x86: DMA support for SEV memory encryption Brijesh Singh
2017-03-08 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/32] x86: Unroll string I/O when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/32] x86: Add early boot support when running with SEV active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-09 14:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-09 16:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-09 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 16:35 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 14:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 15:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 16:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2017-03-16 16:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/32] KVM: SVM: Enable SEV by setting the SEV_ENABLE CPU feature Brijesh Singh
2017-03-09 19:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/32] x86: mm: Provide support to use memblock when spliting large pages Brijesh Singh
2017-03-10 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-10 22:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-16 22:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 10:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 10:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 10:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-17 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-17 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-18 16:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 14:05 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-06 17:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-06 18:37 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-04-07 11:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-07 14:50 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/32] x86: Add support for changing memory encryption attribute in early boot Brijesh Singh
2017-03-24 17:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-27 15:07 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/32] x86: kvm: Provide support to create Guest and HV shared per-CPU variables Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-28 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-29 15:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-02 15:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/32] x86: kvmclock: Clear encryption attribute when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/32] kvm: svm: Use the hardware provided GPA instead of page walk Brijesh Singh
2017-03-29 15:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-29 17:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/32] crypto: ccp: Introduce the AMD Secure Processor device Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 17:39 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-03-02 19:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 13:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/32] crypto: ccp: Add Platform Security Processor (PSP) interface support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/32] crypto: ccp: Add Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) " Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/32] kvm: svm: prepare to reserve asid for SEV guest Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/32] kvm: introduce KVM_MEMORY_ENCRYPT_OP ioctl Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/32] kvm: x86: prepare for SEV guest management API support Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_START command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:20 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_FINISH command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV GUEST_STATUS command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV DEBUG_DECRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:41 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-17 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV DEBUG_ENCRYPT command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:34 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV LAUNCH_MEASURE command Brijesh Singh
2017-03-02 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/32] x86: kvm: Pin the guest memory when SEV is active Brijesh Singh
2017-03-16 10:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16 18:17 ` Brijesh Singh
2017-03-03 20:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/32] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD) Bjorn Helgaas
2017-03-03 20:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 21:15 ` Brijesh Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170302173936.GC11970@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.o \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=gary.hook@amd.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=simon.guinot@sequanux.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox