From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Still OOM problems with 4.9er/4.10er kernels
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:14:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170228081420.GB26792@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73c9ee73-6981-2597-5692-ad49a41770aa@wiesinger.com>
On Tue 28-02-17 07:06:41, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 27.02.2017 09:27, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Sun 26-02-17 09:40:42, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> >>On 04.01.2017 10:11, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>>The VM stops working (e.g. not pingable) after around 8h (will be restarted
> >>>>automatically), happened serveral times.
> >>>>
> >>>>Had also further OOMs which I sent to Mincham.
> >>>Could you post them to the mailing list as well, please?
> >>Still OOMs on dnf update procedure with kernel 4.10: 4.10.0-1.fc26.x86_64 as
> >>well on 4.9.9-200.fc25.x86_64
> >>
> >>On 4.10er kernels:
> >[...]
> >>kernel: Node 0 DMA32 free:5012kB min:2264kB low:2828kB high:3392kB
> >>active_anon:143580kB inactive_anon:143300kB active_file:2576kB
> >>inactive_file:2560kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:376688kB
> >>managed:353968kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:13708kB
> >>slab_unreclaimable:18064kB kernel_stack:2352kB pagetables:12888kB bounce:0kB
> >>free_pcp:412kB local_pcp:88kB free_cma:0kB
> >[...]
> >
> >>On 4.9er kernels:
> >[...]
> >>kernel: Node 0 DMA32 free:3356kB min:2668kB low:3332kB high:3996kB
> >>active_anon:122148kB inactive_anon:112068kB active_file:81324kB
> >>inactive_file:101972kB unevictable:0kB writepending:4648kB present:507760kB
> >>managed:484384kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:17660kB
> >>slab_unreclaimable:21404kB kernel_stack:2432kB pagetables:10124kB bounce:0kB
> >>free_pcp:120kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB
> >In both cases the amount if free memory is above the min watermark, so
> >we shouldn't be hitting the oom. We might have somebody freeing memory
> >after the last attempt, though...
> >
> >[...]
> >>Should be very easy to reproduce with a low mem VM (e.g. 192MB) under KVM
> >>with ext4 and Fedora 25 and some memory load and updating the VM.
> >>
> >>Any further progress?
> >The linux-next (resp. mmotm tree) has new tracepoints which should help
> >to tell us more about what is going on here. Could you try to enable
> >oom/reclaim_retry_zone and vmscan/mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_{begin,end}
>
> Is this available in this version?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=862775
>
> kernel-4.11.0-0.rc0.git5.1.fc26
no idea.
>
> How to enable?
mount -t tracefs none /trace
echo 1 > /trace/events/oom/reclaim_retry_zone/enabled
echo 1 > /trace/events/vmscan/mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin
echo 1 > /trace/events/vmscan/mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-28 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <aa4a3217-f94c-0477-b573-796c84255d1e@wiesinger.com>
[not found] ` <c4ddfc91-7c84-19ed-b69a-18403e7590f9@wiesinger.com>
2016-12-09 7:06 ` Still OOM problems with 4.9er kernels Gerhard Wiesinger
2016-12-09 13:40 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-09 15:52 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2016-12-09 15:58 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2016-12-09 16:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-09 16:58 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2016-12-09 17:30 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-09 18:01 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2016-12-09 21:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-12-10 13:50 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2016-12-12 8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-23 2:55 ` Minchan Kim
2017-01-01 17:20 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-01-04 8:40 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-01-04 9:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-26 8:40 ` Still OOM problems with 4.9er/4.10er kernels Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-02-27 8:27 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-28 6:06 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-02-28 8:14 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-02-27 9:02 ` Minchan Kim
2017-02-27 9:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-28 5:17 ` Minchan Kim
2017-02-28 8:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-02 7:17 ` Minchan Kim
2017-03-16 6:38 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-03-16 8:27 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-16 8:47 ` lkml
2017-03-16 9:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-16 9:23 ` lkml
2017-03-16 9:39 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 16:37 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-03-17 17:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-17 20:08 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-03-19 8:17 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-03-20 1:54 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-19 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-19 16:02 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-03-20 3:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-21 5:59 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-03-21 7:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-23 7:16 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2017-03-23 8:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-23 14:46 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-03-26 8:36 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2016-12-09 16:03 ` Still OOM problems with 4.9er kernels Gerhard Wiesinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170228081420.GB26792@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lists@wiesinger.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox