From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
kys@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] memory-hotplug: Use dev_online for memhp_auto_offline
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:52:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170224165224.GA9363@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871suny22u.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
On Fri 24-02-17 17:40:25, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri 24-02-17 17:09:13, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
[...]
> >> While this will most probably work for me I still disagree with the
> >> concept of 'one size fits all' here and the default 'false' for ACPI,
> >> we're taking away the feature from KVM/Vmware folks so they'll again
> >> come up with the udev rule which has known issues.
> >
> > Well, AFAIU acpi_memory_device_add is a standard way how to announce
> > physical memory added to the system. Where does the KVM/VMware depend on
> > this to do memory ballooning?
>
> As far as I understand memory hotplug in KVM/VMware is pure ACPI memory
> hotplug, there is no specific code for it.
VMware has its ballooning driver AFAIK and I have no idea what KVM uses.
Anyway, acpi_memory_device_add is no different from doing a physical
memory hotplug IIUC so there shouldn't be any difference to how it is
handled.
I will post the patch as an RFC sometimes next week, let's see what
others think about it.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-21 17:22 Nathan Fontenot
2017-02-22 9:32 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-23 12:56 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-23 13:31 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-23 15:09 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-23 15:49 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-23 16:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-23 16:36 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-23 17:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-23 18:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-24 13:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-24 14:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-24 14:41 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-24 15:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-24 15:32 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-24 16:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-24 16:23 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-24 16:40 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-02-24 16:52 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-02-24 17:06 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170224165224.GA9363@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox