linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 0x7f454c46@gmail.com, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv5 0/5] Fix compatible mmap() return pointer over 4Gb
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:36:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170214183621.2537-1-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)

There are a couple of fixes related to x86 mmap():
o 1-2 are just preparation to introduce new mmap bases
o 3 fixes 32-bit syscall returning address over 4Gb in applications,
  launched from 64-bit binaries. This is done by introducing new bases:
  mmap_compat_base and mmap_compat_legacy_base.
  Those bases are separated from 64-bit ones, which allows to use
  mmap base according to bitness of the syscall.
  Which makes the behavior of 32-bit syscalls the same independently
  of launched binary's bitness (the same for 64-bit syscalls).
  It also makes possible to allocate with 64-bit mmap() address higher
  than 4Gb in compat ELFs - that may be used when 4Gb is not enough or
  with MAP_FIXED for hiding that mapping from 32-bit address space.
o 4 fixes behavior of MAP_32BIT - at this moment it's related
  to the bitness of executed binary, not of the syscall.
o 5 is a selftest to check that 32-bit mmap() does return 32-bit
  pointer.

Changes since v4 (Thomas's review):
- rewrote changelogs (so they should be readable by humans also)
- made code simpler (fighting to ifdef horror, etc)

Changes since v3:
- fixed usage of 64-bit random mask for 32-bit mm->mmap_compat_base,
  during introducing mmap_compat{_legacy,}_base

Changes since v2:
- don't distinguish native and compat tasks by TIF_ADDR32,
  introduced mmap_compat{_legacy,}_base which allows to treat them
  the same
- fixed kbuild errors

Changes since v1:
- Recalculate mmap_base instead of using max possible virtual address
  for compat/native syscall. That will make policy for allocation the
  same in 32-bit binaries and in 32-bit syscalls in 64-bit binaries.
  I need this because sys_mmap() in restored 32-bit process shouldn't
  hit the stack area.
- Fixed mmap() with MAP_32BIT flag in the same usecases
- used in_compat_syscall() helper rather TS_COMPAT check (Andy noticed)
- introduced find_top() helper as suggested by Andy to simplify code
- fixed test error-handeling: it checked the result of sys_mmap() with
  MMAP_FAILED, which is not correct, as it calls raw syscall - now
  checks return value to be aligned to PAGE_SIZE.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>

Dmitry Safonov (5):
  x86/mm: introduce arch_rnd() to compute 32/64 mmap rnd
  x86/mm: add task_size parameter to mmap_base()
  x86/mm: introduce mmap_compat_base for 32-bit mmap()
  x86/mm: check in_compat_syscall() instead TIF_ADDR32 for
    mmap(MAP_32BIT)
  selftests/x86: add test for 32-bit mmap() return addr

 arch/Kconfig                                   |   7 +
 arch/x86/Kconfig                               |   1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h                     |  27 ++--
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h               |   4 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c                   |  27 +++-
 arch/x86/mm/mmap.c                             | 109 ++++++++-----
 include/linux/mm_types.h                       |   5 +
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile           |   2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_compat_mmap.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 332 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_compat_mmap.c

-- 
2.11.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2017-02-14 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-14 18:36 Dmitry Safonov [this message]
2017-02-14 18:36 ` [PATCHv5 1/5] x86/mm: introduce arch_rnd() to compute 32/64 mmap rnd Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-14 22:22   ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-15  9:34     ` Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-14 18:36 ` [PATCHv5 2/5] x86/mm: add task_size parameter to mmap_base() Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-14 18:36 ` [PATCHv5 3/5] x86/mm: introduce mmap_compat_base for 32-bit mmap() Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-14 18:36 ` [PATCHv5 4/5] x86/mm: check in_compat_syscall() instead TIF_ADDR32 for mmap(MAP_32BIT) Dmitry Safonov
2017-02-14 18:36 ` [PATCHv5 5/5] selftests/x86: add test for 32-bit mmap() return addr Dmitry Safonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170214183621.2537-1-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox