From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: PCID review?
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:25:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210222522.udpl6cgai24lg5tf@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWToSZZsXHyrXg+YRiyvjRtWd7J0Myvn_mjJJdJoCXr+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 02:07:19PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> We'll see. The main benchmark that I'm relying on (so far) is that
> context switches get way faster, just ping ponging back and forth. I
> suspect that the TLB refill cost is only a small part.
Is that a microbenchmark or something more "presentable"?
We really should pay attention to the complexity and what that actually
brings us in the end.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-07 18:56 Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-07 19:11 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-07 19:24 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-02-07 19:37 ` Nadav Amit
2017-02-08 16:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-07 21:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-02-08 16:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-08 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-02-08 20:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-09 0:10 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-10 2:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-10 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-10 16:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-10 21:57 ` Mel Gorman
2017-02-10 22:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-10 22:25 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-02-10 22:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-13 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170210222522.udpl6cgai24lg5tf@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox