linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, vbabka@suse.cz, riel@redhat.com,
	vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, anton.vorontsov@linaro.org,
	minchan@kernel.org, shashim@codeaurora.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] mm: vmscan: do not pass reclaimed slab to vmpressure
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:48:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202104808.GG22806@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170202104422.GF22806@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu 02-02-17 11:44:22, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 31-01-17 14:32:08, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> > During global reclaim, the nr_reclaimed passed to vmpressure
> > includes the pages reclaimed from slab. But the corresponding
> > scanned slab pages is not passed. This can cause total reclaimed
> > pages to be greater than scanned, causing an unsigned underflow
> > in vmpressure resulting in a critical event being sent to root
> > cgroup. So do not consider reclaimed slab pages for vmpressure
> > calculation. The reclaimed pages from slab can be excluded because
> > the freeing of a page by slab shrinking depends on each slab's
> > object population, making the cost model (i.e. scan:free) different
> > from that of LRU.
> 
> This might be true but what happens if the slab reclaim contributes
> significantly to the overal reclaim? This would be quite rare but not
> impossible.
> 
> I am wondering why we cannot simply make cap nr_reclaimed to nr_scanned
> and be done with this all? Sure it will be imprecise but the same will
> be true with this approach.

In other words something as "beautiful" as the following:
diff --git a/mm/vmpressure.c b/mm/vmpressure.c
index 149fdf6c5c56..abea42817dd0 100644
--- a/mm/vmpressure.c
+++ b/mm/vmpressure.c
@@ -236,6 +236,15 @@ void vmpressure(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool tree,
 		return;
 
 	/*
+	 * Due to accounting issues - e.g. THP contributing 1 to scanned but
+	 * potentially much more to reclaimed or SLAB pages not contributing
+	 * to scanned at all - we have to skew reclaimed to prevent from
+	 * wrong pressure levels due to overflows.
+	 */
+	if (reclaimed > scanned)
+		reclaimed = scanned;
+
+	/*
 	 * If we got here with no pages scanned, then that is an indicator
 	 * that reclaimer was unable to find any shrinkable LRUs at the
 	 * current scanning depth. But it does not mean that we should
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-27  8:13 [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Vinayak Menon
2017-01-27  8:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: vmpressure: fix sending wrong events on underflow Vinayak Menon
2017-01-30 23:58   ` Minchan Kim
2017-01-30 23:56 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] mm: vmscan: do not pass reclaimed slab to vmpressure Minchan Kim
2017-01-31  7:48   ` vinayak menon
2017-01-31  9:02 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Vinayak Menon
2017-02-01  6:12   ` Minchan Kim
2017-02-02 10:44   ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-02 10:48     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-02-02 11:25       ` vinayak menon
2017-02-02 11:52         ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-02 15:30           ` vinayak menon
2017-02-02 16:01             ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-03  5:26               ` vinayak menon
2017-02-03 14:59                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-06 11:31                   ` vinayak menon
2017-02-02 11:28     ` vinayak menon
2017-02-03  6:17     ` Minchan Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170202104808.GG22806@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shashim@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox