linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] [RFC v2] sched: make DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK() work with clang
Date: Wed,  1 Feb 2017 17:40:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170201164030.2379546-1-arnd@arndb.de> (raw)

Building with clang, we get a warning for each use of COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK, e.g.:

block/blk-exec.c:103:29: warning: variable 'wait' is uninitialized when used within its own initialization [-Wuninitialized]
include/linux/completion.h:61:58: note: expanded from macro 'DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK'
include/linux/completion.h:34:29: note: expanded from macro 'COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK'

This seems to be a problem in clang, but it's relatively easy to work around
by changing the assignment.

I filed a bug against clang for the warning, but if we want to support old versions,
we may want this change as well.

I have not yet checked if the new version produces worse object code.

Link: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31829
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v2: send the correct patch
---
 include/linux/completion.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/completion.h b/include/linux/completion.h
index 5d5aaae3af43..fa5d3efaba56 100644
--- a/include/linux/completion.h
+++ b/include/linux/completion.h
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct completion {
 	{ 0, __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER((work).wait) }
 
 #define COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(work) \
-	({ init_completion(&work); work; })
+	(*init_completion(&work))
 
 /**
  * DECLARE_COMPLETION - declare and initialize a completion structure
@@ -70,10 +70,11 @@ struct completion {
  * This inline function will initialize a dynamically created completion
  * structure.
  */
-static inline void init_completion(struct completion *x)
+static inline struct completion *init_completion(struct completion *x)
 {
 	x->done = 0;
 	init_waitqueue_head(&x->wait);
+	return x;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.9.0

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

                 reply	other threads:[~2017-02-01 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170201164030.2379546-1-arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox