linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm, page_alloc: Drain per-cpu pages from workqueue context
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:26:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170120152606.w3hb53m2w6thzsqq@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06c39883-eff5-1412-a148-b063aa7bcc5f@suse.cz>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 03:26:05PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > @@ -2392,8 +2404,24 @@ void drain_all_pages(struct zone *zone)
> >  		else
> >  			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps);
> >  	}
> > -	on_each_cpu_mask(&cpus_with_pcps, (smp_call_func_t) drain_local_pages,
> > -								zone, 1);
> > +
> > +	if (works) {
> > +		for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps) {
> > +			struct work_struct *work = per_cpu_ptr(works, cpu);
> > +			INIT_WORK(work, drain_local_pages_wq);
> > +			schedule_work_on(cpu, work);
> 
> This translates to queue_work_on(), which has the comment of "We queue
> the work to a specific CPU, the caller must ensure it can't go away.",
> so is this safe? lru_add_drain_all() uses get_online_cpus() around this.
> 

get_online_cpus() would be required.

> schedule_work_on() also uses the generic system_wq, while lru drain has
> its own workqueue with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM so it seems that would be useful
> here as well?
> 

I would be reluctant to introduce a dedicated queue unless there was a
definite case where an OOM occurred because pages were pinned on per-cpu
lists and couldn't be drained because the buddy allocator was depleted.
As it was, I thought the fallback case was excessively paranoid.

> > +		}
> > +		for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps)
> > +			flush_work(per_cpu_ptr(works, cpu));
> > +	} else {
> > +		for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_with_pcps) {
> > +			struct work_struct work;
> > +
> > +			INIT_WORK(&work, drain_local_pages_wq);
> > +			schedule_work_on(cpu, &work);
> > +			flush_work(&work);
> 
> Totally out of scope, but I wonder if schedule_on_each_cpu() could use
> the same fallback that's here?
> 

I'm not aware of a case where it really has been a problem. I only considered
it here as the likely caller is in a context that is failing allocations.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-20 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-17  9:29 [PATCH 0/4] Use per-cpu allocator for !irq requests and prepare for a bulk allocator v4 Mel Gorman
2017-01-17  9:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 18:07   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-01-17 18:17     ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-17 20:20       ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 21:07         ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 21:24           ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-17  9:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm, page_alloc: Split alloc_pages_nodemask Mel Gorman
2017-01-17  9:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, page_alloc: Drain per-cpu pages from workqueue context Mel Gorman
2017-01-20 14:26   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-20 15:26     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2017-01-23 16:29       ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-23 16:50         ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 17:03       ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-23 20:04         ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 20:55           ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-23 23:04             ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-24 16:07               ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-24 23:54                 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-25  2:02                   ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-25  8:30                     ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-24 11:08   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-17  9:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm, page_alloc: Only use per-cpu allocator for irq-safe requests Mel Gorman
2017-01-20 15:02   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-23 11:17     ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 15:39 [PATCH 0/4] Use per-cpu allocator for !irq requests and prepare for a bulk allocator v5 Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 15:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm, page_alloc: Drain per-cpu pages from workqueue context Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170120152606.w3hb53m2w6thzsqq@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox