From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026BE6B0033 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:24:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id c206so13840015wme.3 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:24:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si10526030wrc.145.2017.01.13.01.24.24 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:24:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:24:21 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] pro-active compaction Message-ID: <20170113092420.GF25212@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1484291673-2239-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1484291673-2239-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: js1304@gmail.com Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Joonsoo Kim On Fri 13-01-17 16:14:28, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > From: Joonsoo Kim > > Hello, > > This is a patchset for pro-active compaction to reduce fragmentation. > It is a just RFC patchset so implementation detail isn't good. > I submit this for people who want to check the effect of pro-active > compaction. > > Patch 1 ~ 4 introduces new metric for checking fragmentation. I think > that this new metric is useful to check fragmentation state > regardless of usefulness of pro-active compaction. Please let me know > if someone see that this new metric is useful. I'd like to submit it, > separately. Could you describe this metric from a high level POV please? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org