From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm, thp: add new defer+madvise defrag option
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:01:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170112080059.GA2264@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2099d74d-fa2c-e67e-b528-66598d072329@suse.cz>
On Wed 11-01-17 08:35:27, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [+CC linux-api]
>
> On 01/11/2017 01:15 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> > There is no thp defrag option that currently allows MADV_HUGEPAGE regions
> > to do direct compaction and reclaim while all other thp allocations simply
> > trigger kswapd and kcompactd in the background and fail immediately.
> >
> > The "defer" setting simply triggers background reclaim and compaction for
> > all regions, regardless of MADV_HUGEPAGE, which makes it unusable for our
> > userspace where MADV_HUGEPAGE is being used to indicate the application is
> > willing to wait for work for thp memory to be available.
> >
> > The "madvise" setting will do direct compaction and reclaim for these
> > MADV_HUGEPAGE regions, but does not trigger kswapd and kcompactd in the
> > background for anybody else.
> >
> > For reasonable usage, there needs to be a mesh between the two options.
> > This patch introduces a fifth mode, "defer+madvise", that will do direct
> > reclaim and compaction for MADV_HUGEPAGE regions and trigger background
> > reclaim and compaction for everybody else so that hugepages may be
> > available in the near future.
> >
> > A proposal to allow direct reclaim and compaction for MADV_HUGEPAGE
> > regions as part of the "defer" mode, making it a very powerful setting and
> > avoids breaking userspace, was offered:
> > http://marc.info/?t=148236612700003. This additional mode is a
> > compromise.
> >
> > A second proposal to allow both "defer" and "madvise" to be selected at
> > the same time was also offered: http://marc.info/?t=148357345300001.
> > This is possible, but there was a concern that it might break existing
> > userspaces the parse the output of the defrag mode, so the fifth option
> > was introduced instead.
> >
> > This patch also cleans up the helper function for storing to "enabled"
> > and "defrag" since the former supports three modes while the latter
> > supports five and triple_flag_store() was getting unnecessarily messy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>
> alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask() would have been IMHO simpler if a new
> internal flag wasn't added, and combination of two existing for defer
> and madvise used,
I agree with Vlastimil here. The patch can do without touching anything
outside of the sysfs handling.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-12 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 23:41 [patch] mm, thp: add new background " David Rientjes
2017-01-05 10:13 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-05 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-05 13:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-05 15:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-05 22:54 ` David Rientjes
2017-01-06 8:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-06 14:01 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-06 22:20 ` David Rientjes
2017-01-09 10:04 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-09 12:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-10 2:19 ` David Rientjes
2017-01-10 3:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2017-01-10 8:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-10 23:52 ` David Rientjes
2017-01-10 13:01 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-11 0:15 ` [patch v2] mm, thp: add new defer+madvise " David Rientjes
2017-01-11 7:35 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-12 8:01 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-01-11 8:56 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-12 0:16 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170112080059.GA2264@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox