From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f197.google.com (mail-wj0-f197.google.com [209.85.210.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E566B0285 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:05:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wj0-f197.google.com with SMTP id o3so46703482wjo.1 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:05:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y6si17874050wjh.73.2016.12.19.02.05.51 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:05:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:05:49 +0100 From: Petr Mladek Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify node/zone name printing Message-ID: <20161219100549.GL393@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20161216123232.26307-1-mhocko@kernel.org> <2094d241-f40b-2f21-b90b-059374bcd2c2@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2094d241-f40b-2f21-b90b-059374bcd2c2@suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Joonsoo Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Michal Hocko , Sergey Senozhatsky On Mon 2016-12-19 08:00:47, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 12/16/2016 01:32 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > From: Michal Hocko > > > > show_node currently only prints Node id while it is always followed by > > printing zone->name. As the node information is conditional to > > CONFIG_NUMA we have to be careful to always terminate the previous > > continuation line before printing the zone name. This is quite ugly > > and easy to mess up. Let's rename show_node to show_zone_node and > > make sure that it will always start at a new line. We can drop the ugly > > printk(KERN_CONT "\n") from show_free_areas. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > index 3f2c9e535f7f..5324efa8b9d0 100644 > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > @@ -4120,10 +4120,12 @@ unsigned long nr_free_pagecache_pages(void) > > return nr_free_zone_pages(gfp_zone(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE)); > > } > > > > -static inline void show_node(struct zone *zone) > > +static inline void show_zone_node(struct zone *zone) > > { > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)) > > - printk("Node %d ", zone_to_nid(zone)); > > + printk("Node %d %s", zone_to_nid(zone), zone->name); > > + else > > + printk("%s: ", zone->name); > > } > > > > long si_mem_available(void) > > @@ -4371,9 +4373,8 @@ void show_free_areas(unsigned int filter) > > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) > > free_pcp += per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu)->pcp.count; > > > > - show_node(zone); > > + show_zone_node(zone); > > printk(KERN_CONT > > - "%s" The new code will printk "%s: " when called with disabled CONFIG_NUMA. Is the added ": " OK? Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org