From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F166B025E for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 06:06:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id y16so4894223wmd.6 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2016 03:06:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp08.blacknight.com (outbound-smtp08.blacknight.com. [46.22.139.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d81si12702526wmc.164.2016.12.08.03.06.57 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Dec 2016 03:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.blacknight.com (pemlinmail03.blacknight.ie [81.17.254.16]) by outbound-smtp08.blacknight.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C391C203D for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:06:57 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 11:06:56 +0000 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: High-order per-cpu page allocator v7 Message-ID: <20161208110656.bnkvqg73qnjkehbc@techsingularity.net> References: <20161207101228.8128-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <1481137249.4930.59.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20161207194801.krhonj7yggbedpba@techsingularity.net> <1481141424.4930.71.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20161207211958.s3ymjva54wgakpkm@techsingularity.net> <20161207232531.fxqdgrweilej5gs6@techsingularity.net> <20161208092231.55c7eacf@redhat.com> <20161208091806.gzcxlerxprcjvt3l@techsingularity.net> <20161208114308.1c6a424f@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161208114308.1c6a424f@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: Eric Dumazet , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Johannes Weiner , Joonsoo Kim , Linux-MM , Linux-Kernel On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:43:08AM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > That's expected. In the initial sniff-test, I saw negligible packet loss. > > I'm waiting to see what the full set of network tests look like before > > doing any further adjustments. > > For netperf I will not recommend adjusting the global default > /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_default as netperf have means of adjusting this > value from the application (which were the options you setup too low > and just removed). I think you should keep this as the default for now > (unless Eric says something else), as this should cover most users. > Ok, the current state is that buffer sizes are only set for netperf UDP_STREAM and only when running over a real network. The values selected were specific to the network I had available so milage may vary. localhost is left at the defaults. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org