Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: High-order per-cpu page allocator v7

[Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>]

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:40:47AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > Which is related to the fundamentals of fragmentation control in
> > general. At some point there will have to be a revisit to get back to
> > the type of reliability that existed in 3.0-era without the massive
> > overhead it incurred. As stated before, I agree it's important but
> > outside the scope of this patch.
> 
> What reliability issues are there? 3.X kernels were better in what
> way? Which overhead are we talking about?
> 

3.0-era kernels had better fragmentation control, higher success rates at
allocation etc. I vaguely recall that it had fewer sources of high-order
allocations but I don't remember specifics and part of that could be the
lack of THP at the time. The overhead was massive due to massive stalls
and excessive reclaim -- hours to complete some high-allocation stress
tests even if the success rate was high.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>