linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
To: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] drivers: dma-coherent: use MEMREMAP_WB instead of MEMREMAP_WC
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 09:27:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161109092726.GA6009@e106950-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478682609-26477-1-git-send-email-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>

Hi Jaewon,

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:10:09PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>Commit 6b03ae0d42bf (drivers: dma-coherent: use MEMREMAP_WC for DMA_MEMORY_MA)
>added MEMREMAP_WC for DMA_MEMORY_MAP. If, however, CPU cache can be used on
>DMA_MEMORY_MAP, I think MEMREMAP_WC can be changed to MEMREMAP_WB. On my local
>ARM device, memset in dma_alloc_from_coherent sometimes takes much longer with
>MEMREMAP_WC compared to MEMREMAP_WB.
>
>Test results on AArch64 by allocating 4MB with putting trace_printk right
>before and after memset.
>	MEMREMAP_WC : 11.0ms, 5.7ms, 4.2ms, 4.9ms, 5.4ms, 4.3ms, 3.5ms
>	MEMREMAP_WB : 0.7ms, 0.6ms, 0.6ms, 0.6ms, 0.6ms, 0.5ms, 0.4 ms
>

This doesn't look like a good idea to me. The point of coherent memory
is to have it non-cached, however WB will make writes hit the cache.

Writing to the cache is of course faster than writing to RAM, but
that's not what we want to do here.

-Brian

>Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
>---
> drivers/base/dma-coherent.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
>index 640a7e6..0512a1d 100644
>--- a/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
>+++ b/drivers/base/dma-coherent.c
>@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static bool dma_init_coherent_memory(
> 		goto out;
>
> 	if (flags & DMA_MEMORY_MAP)
>-		mem_base = memremap(phys_addr, size, MEMREMAP_WC);
>+		mem_base = memremap(phys_addr, size, MEMREMAP_WB);
> 	else
> 		mem_base = ioremap(phys_addr, size);
> 	if (!mem_base)
>-- 
>1.9.1
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-09  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-09  9:10 Jaewon Kim
2016-11-09  9:27 ` Brian Starkey [this message]
2016-11-09  9:47   ` Jaewon Kim
2016-11-09 10:23     ` Brian Starkey
2016-11-10  1:41       ` Jaewon Kim
2016-11-10  9:51         ` Brian Starkey
2016-11-11  9:53           ` Jaewon Kim
2016-11-15  8:07             ` Jaewon Kim
2016-11-16 15:29               ` Brian Starkey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161109092726.GA6009@e106950-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=brian.starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=jaewon31.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox