From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scripts: Include postprocessing script for memory allocation tracing
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:13:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161018131343.GJ12092@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A6E7231A-54FF-4D5C-90F5-0A8C4126CFEA@gmail.com>
On Mon 17-10-16 13:31:57, Janani Ravichandran wrote:
>
> > On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org <mailto:mhocko@kernel.org>> wrote:
> >
> > trace_mm_page_alloc will tell you details about the allocation, like
> > gfp mask, order but it doesn't tell you how long the allocation took at
> > its current form. So either you have to note jiffies at the allocation
> > start and then add the end-start in the trace point or we really need
> > another trace point to note the start. The later has an advantage that
> > we do not add unnecessary load for jiffies when the tracepoint is
> > disabled.
>
> The function graph tracer can tell us how long alloc_pages_nodemask() took.
> Cana??t that, combined with the context information given by trace_mm_page_alloc
> give us what we want? Correct me if I am wrong.
yes, function_graph tracer will give you _some_ information but it will
not have the context you are looking for, right? See the following
example
------------------------------------------
0) x-www-b-22756 => x-termi-4083
------------------------------------------
0) | __alloc_pages_nodemask() {
0) | /* mm_page_alloc: page=ffffea000411b380 pfn=1066702 order=0 migratetype=0 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL */
0) 3.328 us | }
3) | __alloc_pages_nodemask() {
3) | /* mm_page_alloc: page=ffffea0008f1f6c0 pfn=2344923 order=0 migratetype=0 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL */
3) 1.011 us | }
0) | __alloc_pages_nodemask() {
0) | /* mm_page_alloc: page=ffffea000411b380 pfn=1066702 order=0 migratetype=0 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL */
0) 0.587 us | }
3) | __alloc_pages_nodemask() {
3) | /* mm_page_alloc: page=ffffea0008f1f6c0 pfn=2344923 order=0 migratetype=0 gfp_flags=GFP_KERNEL */
3) 1.125 us | }
How do I know which process has performed those allocations? I know that
CPU0 should be running x-termi-4083 but what is running on other CPUs?
Let me explain my usecase I am very interested in. Say I that a usespace
application is not performing well. I would like to see some statistics
about memory allocations performed for that app - are there few outliers
or the allocation stalls increase gradually? Where do we spend time during
that allocation? Reclaim LRU pages? Compaction or the slab shrinkers?
To answer those questions I need to track particular events (alocation,
reclaim, compaction) to the process and know how long each step
took. Maybe we can reconstruct something from the above output but it is
a major PITA. If we either hard start/stop pairs for each step (which
we already do have for reclaim, compaction AFAIR) then this is an easy
scripting. Another option would be to have only a single tracepoint for
each step with a timing information.
See my point?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-11 22:24 Janani Ravichandran
2016-09-12 12:16 ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-13 18:04 ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-09-19 9:42 ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-22 15:30 ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-09-23 8:07 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-06 12:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 14:43 ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-10-15 23:31 ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-10-16 7:33 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <CANnt6X=RpSnuxGXZfF6Qa5mJpzC8gL3wkKJi3tQMZJBZJVWF3w@mail.gmail.com>
2016-10-17 17:31 ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-10-18 13:13 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-10-20 23:10 ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-10-21 7:08 ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-27 15:42 ` Janani Ravichandran
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-19 11:38 Janani Ravichandran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161018131343.GJ12092@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox