linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: page_waitqueue() considered harmful
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:14:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160929071451.GI3318@worktop.controleur.wifipass.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160929164231.166d2910@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:42:31PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Take Alpha instead. It's using 32-bit ops.

Hmm, my Alpha docs are on the other machine, but I suppose the problem
is 64bit immediates (which would be a common problem I suppose, those
don't really work well on x86 either).

Yes, that does make it all more tricky than desired.

OTOH maybe this is a good excuse to (finally) sanitize the bitmap API to
use a fixed width. It using 'unsigned long' has been something of a pain
at times.

With that it would be 'obvious' bits need to be part of the same 32bit
word and we can use the normal smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() again.

Given our bitops really are only about single bits, I can't see the
change making a real performance difference.

OTOH, the non atomic things like weight and ff[sz] do benefit from using
the longer words. Bother..

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-29  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-26 20:58 Linus Torvalds
2016-09-26 21:23 ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-26 21:30   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-26 23:11   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-09-27  1:01     ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-27  7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-27  8:54   ` Mel Gorman
2016-09-27  9:11     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-09-27  9:42       ` Mel Gorman
2016-09-27  9:52       ` Minchan Kim
2016-09-27 12:11         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-09-29  8:01     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-29 12:55       ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-29 13:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-29 13:54           ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-29 15:05         ` Rik van Riel
2016-09-27  8:03 ` Jan Kara
2016-09-27  8:31 ` Mel Gorman
2016-09-27 14:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-27 15:08     ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-27 16:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-27 16:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 10:45     ` Mel Gorman
2016-09-28 11:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 16:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-09-29 13:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03 10:47             ` Mel Gorman
2016-09-27 14:53   ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-27 15:17     ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-27 16:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-27 17:06       ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-28  7:05         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 11:05           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-09-28 11:16             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28 12:58               ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-09-29  1:31           ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-29  2:12             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-09-29  6:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-29  6:42               ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-09-29  7:14                 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-09-29  7:43                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-28  7:40     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160929071451.GI3318@worktop.controleur.wifipass.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox