From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, dsmythies@telus.net,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 172981] New: [bisected] SLAB: extreme load averages and over 2000 kworker threads
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:10:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160927111059.282a35c89266202d3cb2f953@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-172981-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:57:08 +0000 bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172981
>
> Bug ID: 172981
> Summary: [bisected] SLAB: extreme load averages and over 2000
> kworker threads
> Product: Memory Management
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 4.7+
> Hardware: All
> OS: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Slab Allocator
> Assignee: akpm@linux-foundation.org
> Reporter: dsmythies@telus.net
> Regression: No
>
> Immediately after boot, extreme load average numbers and over 2000 kworker
> processes are being observed on my main linux test computer (basically a Ubuntu
> 16.04 server, no GUI). The worker threads appear to be idle, and do disappear
> after the nominal 5 minute timeout, depending on whatever other stuff might run
> in the meantime. However, the number of threads can hugely increase again. The
> issue occurs with ease for kernels compiled using SLAB.
>
> For SLAB, kernel bisection gave:
> 801faf0db8947e01877920e848a4d338dd7a99e7
> "mm/slab: lockless decision to grow cache"
>
> The following monitoring script was used for the below examples:
>
> #!/bin/dash
>
> while [ 1 ];
> do
> echo $(uptime) ::: $(ps -A --no-headers | wc -l) ::: $(ps aux | grep kworker
> | grep -v u | grep -v H | wc -l)
> sleep 10.0
> done
>
> Example (SLAB):
>
> After boot:
>
> 22:26:21 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 295.98, 85.67, 29.47 ::: 2240 :::
> 2074
> 22:26:31 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 250.47, 82.85, 29.15 ::: 2240 :::
> 2074
> 22:26:41 up 1 min, 2 users, load average: 211.96, 80.12, 28.84 ::: 2240 :::
> 2074
> ...
> 22:52:34 up 27 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.43, 5.40 ::: 165 ::: 17
> 22:52:44 up 27 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.42, 5.34 ::: 165 ::: 17
>
> Now type: sudo echo "bla":
>
> 22:53:14 up 27 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.38, 5.17 ::: 493 ::: 345
> 22:53:24 up 28 min, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.36, 5.11 ::: 493 ::: 345
>
> Caused 328 new kworker threads.
> Now queue just a few (8 in this case) very simple jobs.
>
> 22:55:45 up 30 min, 3 users, load average: 0.11, 0.27, 4.38 ::: 493 ::: 345
> 22:55:55 up 30 min, 3 users, load average: 0.09, 0.26, 4.34 ::: 2207 ::: 2059
> 22:56:05 up 30 min, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.25, 4.29 ::: 2207 ::: 2059
>
> If I look at linux/Documentation/workqueue.txt and do:
>
> echo workqueue:workqueue_queue_work > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event
>
> and:
>
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > out.txt
>
> I get somewhere between 10,000 and 20,000 occurrences of
> memcg_kmem_cache_create_func in the file (using my simple test method).
>
> Also tested with kernel 4.8-rc7.
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-172981-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2016-09-27 18:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2016-09-28 2:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-09-28 8:09 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-09-29 2:00 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-29 13:45 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-09-30 8:19 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-30 19:58 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-10-06 5:04 ` Doug Smythies
2016-10-06 6:35 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-10-06 16:02 ` Doug Smythies
2016-10-07 15:55 ` Doug Smythies
2016-09-28 3:13 ` Doug Smythies
2016-09-28 5:18 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-28 6:20 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-09-28 15:22 ` Doug Smythies
2016-09-29 1:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160927111059.282a35c89266202d3cb2f953@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox