From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f72.google.com (mail-wm0-f72.google.com [74.125.82.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADFD8308D for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f72.google.com with SMTP id l4so27614561wml.0 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com. [74.125.82.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s2si12407247wjc.195.2016.08.25.00.11.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id o80so56733064wme.1 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:11:04 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: OOM detection regressions since 4.7 Message-ID: <20160825071103.GC4230@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20160822093249.GA14916@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160822093707.GG13596@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160822100528.GB11890@kroah.com> <20160822105441.GH13596@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160822133114.GA15302@kroah.com> <20160822134227.GM13596@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20160822150517.62dc7cce74f1af6c1f204549@linux-foundation.org> <20160823074339.GB23577@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160823074339.GB23577@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton , Markus Trippelsdorf , Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Ralf-Peter Rohbeck , Jiri Slaby , Olaf Hering Cc: Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Vlastimil Babka , Joonsoo Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML On Tue 23-08-16 09:43:39, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 22-08-16 15:05:17, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:42:28 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > Of course, if Linus/Andrew doesn't like to take those compaction > > > improvements this late then I will ask to merge the partial revert to > > > Linus tree as well and then there is not much to discuss. > > > > This sounds like the prudent option. Can we get 4.8 working > > well-enough, backport that into 4.7.x and worry about the fancier stuff > > for 4.9? > > OK, fair enough. > > I would really appreciate if the original reporters could retest with > this patch on top of the current Linus tree. Any luck with the testing of this patch? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org