Re: [PATCH 5/7] dax: lock based on slot instead of [mapping, index]

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

On Wed 17-08-16 14:25:56, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 15-08-16 13:09:16, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > DAX radix tree locking currently locks entries based on the unique
> > > combination of the 'mapping' pointer and the pgoff_t 'index' for the entry.
> > > This works for PTEs, but as we move to PMDs we will need to have all the
> > > offsets within the range covered by the PMD to map to the same bit lock.
> > > To accomplish this, lock based on the 'slot' pointer in the radix tree
> > > instead of [mapping, index].
> > 
> > I'm not convinced this is safe. What makes the slot pointer still valid
> > after you drop tree_lock? At least radix_tree_shrink() or
> > radix_tree_expand() could move your slot without letting the waiter know
> > and he would be never woken.
> > 
> > 								Honza
> 
> Yep, you're right, thanks for catching that.
> 
> Given that we can't rely on 'slot' being stable, my next idea is to use a
> combination of [mapping, index], but tweak 'index' so that it's always the
> beginning of the entry.  So for 4k entries we'd leave it alone, but for 2MiB
> entries we'd mask it down to the appropriate 2MiB barrier.
> 
> Let me hack on that for a bit, unless you've a better idea.

No, that's what I'd do as well.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>