From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fadump: Disable deferred page struct initialisation
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 11:28:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160804102801.GJ2799@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160804051035.GA11268@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:40:35AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> [2016-08-03 12:40:17]:
>
> > On 08/02/2016 11:35 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > > On a regular kernel with CONFIG_FADUMP and fadump configured, 5% of the
> > > total memory is reserved for booting the kernel on crash. On crash,
> > > fadump kernel reserves the 95% memory and boots into the 5% memory that
> > > was reserved for it. It then parses the reserved 95% memory to collect
> > > the dump.
> > >
> > > The problem is not about the amount of memory thats reserved for fadump
> > > kernel. Even if we increase/decrease, we will still end up with the same
> > > issue.
> >
> > Oh, and the dentry/inode caches are sized based on 100% of memory, not
> > the 5% that's left after the fadump reservation?
>
> Yes, the dentry/inode caches are sized based on the 100% memory.
>
By and large, I'm not a major fan of introducing an API to disable it for
a single feature that is arch-specific because it's very heavy handed.
There is no guarantee that the existence of fadump will cause a failure
If fadump is reserving memory and alloc_large_system_hash(HASH_EARLY)
does not know about then then would an arch-specific callback for
arch_reserved_kernel_pages() be more appropriate? fadump would need to
return how many pages it reserved there. That would shrink the size of
the inode and dentry hash tables when booting with 95% of memory
reserved.
That approach would limit the impact to ppc64 and would be less costly than
doing a memblock walk instead of using nr_kernel_pages for everyone else.
> > Is the deferred initialization kicked in progress at the time we do the
> > dentry/inode allocations? Can waiting a bit let the allocation succeed?
> >
>
> Right now deferred initialisation kicks in after dentry/inode
> allocations.
>
> Can we defer the cache allocations till deferred
> initialisation? I dont know.
Only by backing it with vmalloc memory.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-04 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 13:19 [PATCH 0/0] Disable deferred struct page initialisation on Fadump Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-02 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: Allow disabling deferred struct page initialisation Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-02 18:09 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-03 6:38 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-03 18:17 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-04 5:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-02 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] fadump: Disable deferred page struct initialisation Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-03 5:20 ` Balbir Singh
2016-08-03 6:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-03 11:34 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-08-03 6:35 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-03 19:40 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-04 5:10 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-04 10:28 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2016-08-04 13:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160804102801.GJ2799@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox