From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
Cc: jbaron@akamai.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, m.chehab@samsung.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, k.kozlowski@samsung.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
oleg@redhat.com, gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com,
koct9i@gmail.com, aarcange@redhat.com, aryabinin@virtuozzo.com,
chuansheng.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1081/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:26:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160802092652.52b7c58f@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160802121443.22191-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:14:43 +0800
Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com> wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
NACK!
I find 0444 more readable than S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH.
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index de2c176..fad009c 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ int mmap_rnd_compat_bits __read_mostly = CONFIG_ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS;
> #endif
>
> static bool ignore_rlimit_data;
> -core_param(ignore_rlimit_data, ignore_rlimit_data, bool, 0644);
> +core_param(ignore_rlimit_data, ignore_rlimit_data, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
>
> static void unmap_region(struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct *prev,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 12:14 Baole Ni
2016-08-02 13:26 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160802092652.52b7c58f@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=baolex.ni@intel.com \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=koct9i@gmail.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox