linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: put soft limit reclaim out of way if the excess tree is empty
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:12:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160801141227.GI13544@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160801135757.GB19395@esperanza>

On Mon 01-08-16 16:57:57, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:00:21PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index c265212bec8c..eb7e39c2d948 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -2543,6 +2543,11 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline bool soft_limit_tree_empty(struct mem_cgroup_tree_per_node *mctz)
> > +{
> > +	return rb_last(&mctz->rb_root) == NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> I don't think traversing rb tree as rb_last() does w/o holding the lock
> is a good idea. Why is RB_EMPTY_ROOT() insufficient here?

Of course it is not. Dohh, forgot to refresh the patch! Sorry about
that.

Updated patch.
---

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-01 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-01 10:00 Michal Hocko
2016-08-01 13:57 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-08-01 14:12   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-08-01 14:26     ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-08-01 15:03     ` Johannes Weiner
2016-08-01 15:24       ` Michal Hocko
2016-08-01 17:17         ` Johannes Weiner
2016-08-01 17:39           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160801141227.GI13544@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox