From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm, vmscan: Account for skipped pages as a partial scan
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:26:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160726082638.GD15721@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160726081621.GC15721@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:16:22PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 03:11:01PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Page reclaim determines whether a pgdat is unreclaimable by examining how
> > many pages have been scanned since a page was freed and comparing that to
> > the LRU sizes. Skipped pages are not reclaim candidates but contribute to
> > scanned. This can prematurely mark a pgdat as unreclaimable and trigger
> > an OOM kill.
> >
> > This patch accounts for skipped pages as a partial scan so that an
> > unreclaimable pgdat will still be marked as such but by scaling the cost
> > of a skip, it'll avoid the pgdat being marked prematurely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > ---
> > mm/vmscan.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 6810d81f60c7..e5af357dd4ac 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> > LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped);
> >
> > for (scan = 0; scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan &&
> > - !list_empty(src); scan++) {
> > + !list_empty(src);) {
> > struct page *page;
> >
> > page = lru_to_page(src);
> > @@ -1438,6 +1438,12 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Account for scanned and skipped separetly to avoid the pgdat
> > + * being prematurely marked unreclaimable by pgdat_reclaimable.
> > + */
> > + scan++;
> > +
>
> This logic has potential unbounded retry problem. src would not become
> empty if __isolate_lru_page() return -EBUSY since we move failed page
> to src list again in this case.
Oops.. It would not unbounded retry. It would cause needless retry but
bounded. Sorry about noise.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-21 14:10 [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fixes for premature OOM kills with node-lru v2 Mel Gorman
2016-07-21 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: add per-zone lru list stat Mel Gorman
2016-07-22 15:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-21 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm, vmscan: Remove highmem_file_pages Mel Gorman
2016-07-22 15:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-25 8:09 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-25 9:23 ` [PATCH] mm, vmscan: remove highmem_file_pages -fix Mel Gorman
2016-07-21 14:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: Remove reclaim and compaction retry approximations Mel Gorman
2016-07-22 15:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-25 8:18 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-21 14:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: consider per-zone inactive ratio to deactivate Mel Gorman
2016-07-21 15:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-21 14:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm, vmscan: Account for skipped pages as a partial scan Mel Gorman
2016-07-22 16:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-25 8:39 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-25 9:52 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-26 8:16 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-26 8:26 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2016-07-26 8:11 ` [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fixes for premature OOM kills with node-lru v2 Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-26 12:50 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-28 6:44 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-07-28 10:27 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160726082638.GD15721@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox