From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, oleg@redhat.com,
rientjes@google.com, vdavydov@parallels.com, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Change OOM killer to use list of mm_struct.
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 13:21:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160721112140.GG26379@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468330163-4405-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Tue 12-07-16 22:29:15, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> This series is an update of
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201607080058.BFI87504.JtFOOFQFVHSLOM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp .
>
> This series is based on top of linux-next-20160712 +
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467201562-6709-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org .
I was thinking about this vs. signal_struct::oom_mm [1] and came to the
conclusion that as of now they are mostly equivalent wrt. oom livelock
detection and coping with it. So for now any of them should be good to
go. Good!
Now what about future plans? I would like to get rid of TIF_MEMDIE
altogether and give access to memory reserves to oom victim when they
allocate the memory. Something like:
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 788e4f22e0bb..34446f49c2e1 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3358,7 +3358,7 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
else if (!in_interrupt() &&
((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) ||
- unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))))
+ tsk_is_oom_victim(current))
alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
where tsk_is_oom_victim wouldn't require the given task to go via
out_of_memory. This would solve some of the problems we have right now
when a thread doesn't get access to memory reserves because it never
reaches out_of_memory (e.g. recently mentioned mempool_alloc doing
__GFP_NORETRY). It would also make the code easier to follow. If we want
to implement that we need an easy to implement tsk_is_oom_victim
obviously. With the signal_struct::oom_mm this is really trivial thing.
I am not sure we can do that with the mm list though because we are
loosing the task->mm at certain point in time. The only way I can see
this would fly would be preserving TIF_MEMDIE and setting it for all
threads but I am not sure this is very much better and puts the mm list
approach to a worse possition from my POV.
What do you think Tetsuo?
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467365190-24640-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-21 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-12 13:29 Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm,oom_reaper: Reduce find_lock_task_mm() usage Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm,oom_reaper: Do not attempt to reap a task twice Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm,oom: Use list of mm_struct used by OOM victims Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm,oom: Close oom_has_pending_mm race Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 14:36 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm,oom_reaper: Make OOM reaper use list of mm_struct Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 14:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 15:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-13 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm,oom: Remove OOM_SCAN_ABORT case and signal_struct->oom_victims Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm,oom: Stop clearing TIF_MEMDIE on remote thread Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 14:53 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 15:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-13 8:13 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 13:29 ` [PATCH 8/8] oom_reaper: Revert "oom_reaper: close race with exiting task" Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-12 14:56 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-21 11:21 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-07-22 11:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Change OOM killer to use list of mm_struct Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-22 12:05 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-23 2:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-25 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-25 11:07 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-25 11:21 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-25 11:47 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-25 11:59 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-25 14:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-25 14:17 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-25 21:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-26 7:52 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160721112140.GG26379@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox