From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f70.google.com (mail-lf0-f70.google.com [209.85.215.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA076B025E for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 03:19:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f70.google.com with SMTP id g18so47206179lfg.2 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:19:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a2si1007132wjk.265.2016.07.14.00.19.16 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:19:14 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [memcg:since-4.6 827/827] arch/s390/include/asm/jump_label.h:17:32: error: expected ':' before '__stringify' Message-ID: <20160714071914.GA27689@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <201607140156.2OxakZPq%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <57867DD0.9080801@akamai.com> <20160713110542.b58b2bcc7ca484a56cb903f3@linux-foundation.org> <5786856B.6030600@akamai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5786856B.6030600@akamai.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jason Baron Cc: Andrew Morton , kbuild test robot , kbuild-all@01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On Wed 13-07-16 14:16:11, Jason Baron wrote: > On 07/13/2016 02:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:43:44 -0400 Jason Baron wrote: > > > >> This is likely due to the fact that the s390 bits > >> bits were not pulled into -mm here: > >> > >> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1607.0/03114.html > >> > >> However, I do see them in linux-next, I think from > >> the s390 tree. So perhaps, that patch can be pulled > >> in here as well? > > > > Yup, I have > > jump_label-remove-bugh-atomich-dependencies-for-have_jump_label.patch > > staged after linux-next and it has that dependency on linux-next. > > > > ok, you have the dependency correct, thanks. > > That dependency though is not being honored in the referenced > mm tree branch 'since-4.6', since the relevant s390 patch > is not present. So, if we want to fix it here, we need > that patch... My fault. I haven't noticed this patch. I usually apply everything that is in appropriate sections of series file and then fix up compilation issues. I didn't do my allarch build test the last time due to lack of time so I haven't noticed this. Sorry about that! That being said, I have cherry-picked the s390 part. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org