From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
Stanislav Kozina <skozina@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: System freezes after OOM
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:56:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160713145638.GM28723@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1607131004340.31769@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On Wed 13-07-16 10:18:35, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > [CC David]
> >
> > > > It is caused by the commit f9054c70d28bc214b2857cf8db8269f4f45a5e23.
> > > > Prior to this commit, mempool allocations set __GFP_NOMEMALLOC, so
> > > > they never exhausted reserved memory. With this commit, mempool
> > > > allocations drop __GFP_NOMEMALLOC, so they can dig deeper (if the
> > > > process has PF_MEMALLOC, they can bypass all limits).
> > >
> > > I wonder whether commit f9054c70d28bc214 ("mm, mempool: only set
> > > __GFP_NOMEMALLOC if there are free elements") is doing correct thing.
> > > It says
> > >
> > > If an oom killed thread calls mempool_alloc(), it is possible that
> > > it'll
> > > loop forever if there are no elements on the freelist since
> > > __GFP_NOMEMALLOC prevents it from accessing needed memory reserves in
> > > oom conditions.
> >
> > I haven't studied the patch very deeply so I might be missing something
> > but from a quick look the patch does exactly what the above says.
> >
> > mempool_alloc used to inhibit ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS by default. David has
> > only changed that to allow ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS if there are no objects
> > in the pool and so we have no fallback for the default __GFP_NORETRY
> > request.
>
> The swapper core sets the flag PF_MEMALLOC and calls generic_make_request
> to submit the swapping bio to the block driver. The device mapper driver
> uses mempools for all its I/O processing.
OK, this is the part I have missed. I didn't realize that the swapout
path, which is indeed PF_MEMALLOC, can get down to blk code which uses
mempools. A quick code travers shows that at least
make_request_fn = blk_queue_bio
blk_queue_bio
get_request
__get_request
might do that. And in that case I agree that the above mentioned patch
has unintentional side effects and should be re-evaluated. David, what
do you think? An obvious fixup would be considering TIF_MEMDIE in
mempool_alloc explicitly.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-13 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <57837CEE.1010609@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <f80dc690-7e71-26b2-59a2-5a1557d26713@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <9be09452-de7f-d8be-fd5d-4a80d1cd1ba3@redhat.com>
2016-07-11 15:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-12 6:49 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 23:44 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-13 8:35 ` Jerome Marchand
2016-07-13 11:14 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-13 14:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-13 11:10 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-13 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-13 13:44 ` Milan Broz
2016-07-13 15:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-14 9:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-14 9:46 ` Milan Broz
2016-07-13 15:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-14 10:51 ` [dm-devel] " Ondrej Kozina
2016-07-14 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-14 14:00 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-14 14:59 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-14 15:25 ` Ondrej Kozina
2016-07-14 17:35 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-15 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-15 12:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-15 12:22 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-15 17:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-18 7:22 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-14 14:08 ` Ondrej Kozina
2016-07-14 15:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-14 17:07 ` Ondrej Kozina
2016-07-14 17:36 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-14 17:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-15 11:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-13 13:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-13 13:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-13 14:18 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-13 14:56 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-07-13 15:11 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-13 23:53 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-14 11:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-14 12:29 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-14 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-14 21:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-14 22:04 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-15 11:25 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-15 21:21 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-14 12:27 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-14 20:22 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-15 11:21 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-15 21:25 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-15 21:39 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-15 21:58 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-15 23:53 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-18 15:14 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-14 15:29 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-14 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-15 7:22 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-15 8:23 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-15 12:00 ` Mikulas Patocka
2016-07-15 21:47 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-18 7:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-18 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2016-07-14 0:01 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160713145638.GM28723@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=okozina@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=skozina@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox