From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f71.google.com (mail-oi0-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF5C6B0005 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 22:08:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f71.google.com with SMTP id u201so273516679oie.2 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from takane.zaitcev.us (takane.zaitcev.us. [96.126.117.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n127si1098261oib.282.2016.07.04.19.08.06 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 19:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 20:08:04 -0600 From: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: [patch] Allow user.* xattr in tmpfs Message-ID: <20160704200804.4c54ceb9@lembas.zaitcev.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20160630223608.6ecbec55@lembas.zaitcev.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Pete Zaitcev On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 17:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > - Sam Merritt removing monkey-patching: > > https://review.openstack.org/336323 > I use a very similar patch for testing xattrs on tmpfs with xfstests. >[...] > But without a stronger case for user xattrs on tmpfs, > shouldn't you and I just stick with our patches? I don't want to rebuild kernels all the time. In addition, there's a certain magic that distros are doing to make video on this laptop work. So, I'm going to think over the approaches to the limitation of consumed RAM and come back to you with a patch. Greetings, -- Pete -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org