From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f71.google.com (mail-vk0-f71.google.com [209.85.213.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9276B025E for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vk0-f71.google.com with SMTP id c2so58393813vkg.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u184si22493309qhe.36.2016.06.15.08.09.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:09:03 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 -v4] Handle oom bypass more gracefully Message-ID: <20160615150903.GE7944@redhat.com> References: <1465473137-22531-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1465473137-22531-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tetsuo Handa , David Rientjes , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , LKML On 06/09, Michal Hocko wrote: > > this is the v4 version of the patchse. I would like to ack this series even if I do not pretend I understand all implications. But imo every change makes sense and this version adresses my previous comments, so FWIW: Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org