From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f198.google.com (mail-lb0-f198.google.com [209.85.217.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3246B0253 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 03:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f198.google.com with SMTP id q17so94547747lbn.3 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 00:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com. [74.125.82.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id kb6si24818178wjb.71.2016.05.31.00.32.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 May 2016 00:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id a136so29819455wme.0 for ; Tue, 31 May 2016 00:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:32:28 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] proc, oom: drop bogus task_lock and mm check Message-ID: <20160531073227.GA26128@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1464613556-16708-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <1464613556-16708-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> <20160530174324.GA25382@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160530174324.GA25382@redhat.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Tetsuo Handa , David Rientjes , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , LKML On Mon 30-05-16 19:43:24, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 05/30, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > both oom_adj_write and oom_score_adj_write are using task_lock, > > check for task->mm and fail if it is NULL. This is not needed because > > the oom_score_adj is per signal struct so we do not need mm at all. > > The code has been introduced by 3d5992d2ac7d ("oom: add per-mm oom > > disable count") but we do not do per-mm oom disable since c9f01245b6a7 > > ("oom: remove oom_disable_count"). > > > > The task->mm check is even not correct because the current thread might > > have exited but the thread group might be still alive - e.g. thread > > group leader would lead that echo $VAL > /proc/pid/oom_score_adj would > > always fail with EINVAL while /proc/pid/task/$other_tid/oom_score_adj > > would succeed. This is unexpected at best. > > > > Remove the lock along with the check to fix the unexpected behavior > > and also because there is not real need for the lock in the first place. > > ACK thanks! > and we should also remove lock_task_sighand(). as for oom_adj_read() and > oom_score_adj_read() we can just remove it right now; it was previously > needed to ensure the task->signal != NULL, today this is always true. OK, I will add the following patch to the series. ---