From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com [209.85.192.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149BB6B0005 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 18:02:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id 203so384854725pfy.2 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j2si1071213paw.80.2016.05.23.15.02.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 May 2016 15:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 15:02:02 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] mm, migrate: increment fail count on ENOMEM Message-Id: <20160523150202.70702708ce323b36ad94cbab@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20160520133121.GB5215@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20160520130649.GB5197@dhcp22.suse.cz> <573F0ED0.4010908@suse.cz> <20160520133121.GB5215@dhcp22.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 May 2016 15:31:21 +0200 Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 20-05-16 15:19:12, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > On 05/20/2016 03:06 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > Why don't we need also to count also retries? > > > > We could, but not like you suggest. > > > > > --- > > > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > > > index 53ab6398e7a2..ef9c5211ae3c 100644 > > > --- a/mm/migrate.c > > > +++ b/mm/migrate.c > > > @@ -1190,9 +1190,9 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page, > > > } > > > } > > > } > > > +out: > > > nr_failed += retry; > > > rc = nr_failed; > > > > This overwrites rc == -ENOMEM, which at least compaction needs to recognize. > > But we could duplicate "nr_failed += retry" in the case -ENOMEM. > > Right you are. So we should do > --- > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > index 53ab6398e7a2..123fed94022b 100644 > --- a/mm/migrate.c > +++ b/mm/migrate.c > @@ -1171,6 +1171,7 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from, new_page_t get_new_page, > > switch(rc) { > case -ENOMEM: > + nr_failed += retry + 1; > goto out; > case -EAGAIN: > retry++; > > argh, this was lost. Please resend as a real patch sometime? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org