linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: Avoid exhausting allocation reserves under memory pressure
Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 11:18:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160505091834.GE4386@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160505090750.GD1970@quack2.suse.cz>

On Thu 05-05-16 11:07:50, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 05-05-16 10:24:33, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * Check whether the request to writeback some pages can be merged with some
> > > + * other request which is already pending. If yes, merge it and return true.
> > > + * If no, return false.
> > > + */
> > > +static bool wb_merge_request(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
> > > +			     struct super_block *sb, bool range_cyclic,
> > > +			     enum wb_reason reason)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct wb_writeback_work *work;
> > > +	bool merged = false;
> > > +
> > > +	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> > > +	list_for_each_entry(work, &wb->work_list, list) {
> > 
> > Is the lenght of the list bounded somehow? In other words is it possible
> > that the spinlock would be held for too long to traverse the whole list?
> 
> I was thinking about this as well. With the merging enabled, the number of
> entries queued from wb_start_writeback() is essentially limited by the
> number of writeback reasons and there's only a couple of those. What is
> more questionable is the number of entries queued from
> __writeback_inodes_sb_nr(). Generally there should be a couple at maximum
> either but it is hard to give any guarantee since e.g. filesystems use this
> function to reduce amount of delay-allocated data when they are running out
> of space. Hum, maybe we could limit the merging to scan only the last say
> 16 entries. That should give good results in most cases... Thoughts?

Yes, I guess this sounds reasonable. The merging doesn't have to be
perfect. We primarily want to get rid of (potentially) thousands of
duplicates. And there is always a GFP_NOWAIT fallback IIUC.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-05  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05  8:14 Jan Kara
2016-05-05  8:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-05  9:07   ` Jan Kara
2016-05-05  9:18     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-05-05 21:37     ` Andrew Morton
2016-05-12 16:08       ` Jan Kara
2016-05-16 11:45         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160505091834.GE4386@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox