linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kmap_atomic and preemption
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 17:01:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160504150138.GR3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075F4EA065E@us01wembx1.internal.synopsys.com>

On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:16:11PM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > static inline void *kmap_atomic(struct page *page)
> > {
> > 	preempt_disable();
> > 	pagefault_disable();
> > 	if (!PageHighMem(page))
> > 		return page_address(page);
> >
> > 	return __kmap_atomic(page);
> > }
> 
> I actually want to return early for !PageHighMem and avoid the pointless 2
> LD-ADD-ST to memory for map and 2 LD-SUB-ST for unmap for regular pages for such
> cases.

So I'm fairly sure people rely on the fact you cannot have pagefault
inside a kmap_atomic().

But you could potentially get away with leaving preemption enabled. Give
it a try, see if something goes *bang* ;-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-04 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-04 10:37 Vineet Gupta
2016-05-04 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-04 13:53   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-04 14:01     ` Vineet Gupta
2016-05-04 14:16   ` Vineet Gupta
2016-05-04 15:01     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-05-05 12:37       ` Vineet Gupta
2016-05-04 19:17   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-05-05  9:37     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160504150138.GR3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox