From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] mm, hugetlb_cgroup: round limit_in_bytes down to hugepage size
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:52:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425145223.22617d4c1f12b0f7f4702988@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1604181422220.23710@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:23:58 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > > > +static void hugetlb_cgroup_init(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cgroup,
> > > > > + struct hugetlb_cgroup *parent_h_cgroup)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + int idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + for (idx = 0; idx < HUGE_MAX_HSTATE; idx++) {
> > > > > + struct page_counter *counter = &h_cgroup->hugepage[idx];
> > > > > + struct page_counter *parent = NULL;
> > > > > + unsigned long limit;
> > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (parent_h_cgroup)
> > > > > + parent = &parent_h_cgroup->hugepage[idx];
> > > > > + page_counter_init(counter, parent);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + limit = round_down(PAGE_COUNTER_MAX,
> > > > > + 1 << huge_page_order(&hstates[idx]));
> > > > > + ret = page_counter_limit(counter, limit);
> > > > > + VM_BUG_ON(ret);
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > I fail to see the point for this. Why would want to round down
> > > > PAGE_COUNTER_MAX? It will never make a real difference. Or am I missing
> > > > something?
> > >
> > > Did you try the patch?
> > >
> > > If we're rounding down the user value, it makes sense to be consistent
> > > with the upper bound default to specify intent.
> >
> > The point I've tried to raise is why do we care and add a code if we can
> > never reach that value? Does actually anybody checks for the alignment.
>
> If the user modifies the value successfully, it can never be restored to
> the default since the write handler rounds down. It's a matter of
> consistency for a long-term maintainable kernel and prevents bug reports.
Can we please get the above reasoning into the changelog?
Also, the runtime effects of the patch are unclear - "not possible to
charge partial hugepages" sounds serious, but there's no cc:stable.
Some clarification there also please.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-06 1:25 [patch] " David Rientjes
2016-04-06 7:26 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-04-06 7:33 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-04-06 9:09 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-06 22:10 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
2016-04-07 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 20:22 ` David Rientjes
2016-04-15 13:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-18 21:23 ` David Rientjes
2016-04-25 21:52 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2016-04-25 23:54 ` [patch v3] " David Rientjes
2016-04-25 21:30 ` [patch v2] " David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425145223.22617d4c1f12b0f7f4702988@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel@kyup.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox