From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,oom: Clarify reason to kill other threads sharing the vitctim's memory.
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 06:59:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201604150659.BFI12469.tHLSOFMOJFQVFO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414151838.GK2850@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 15-04-16 00:03:31, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > I would rather be explicit that we _do not care_
> > > about these configurations. It is just PITA maintain and it doesn't make
> > > any sense. So rather than trying to document all the weird thing that
> > > might happen I would welcome a warning "mm shared with OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN
> > > task. Something is broken in your configuration!"
> >
> > Would you please stop rejecting configurations which do not match your values?
>
> Can you point out a single real life example where the above
> configuration would make a sense? This is not about _my_ values. This is
> about general _sanity_. If two/more entities share the mm and they disagree
> about their OOM priorities then something is clearly broken. Don't you think?
> How can the OOM killer do anything sensible here? The API we have
> created is broken because it allows broken configurations too easily. It
> is too late to fix it though so we can only rely on admins to use it
> sensibly.
I explained it at http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201603152015.JAE86937.VFOLtQFOFJOSHM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp .
I don't do such usage does not mean nobody does such usage.
>
> So please try to step back and think about whether it actually make
> sense to make the oom even more complex/confusing for something that
> gives little (if any) sense.
Syscalls respond with "your usage is invalid" (by returning -EINVAL)
than "ignore such usage and crash" (by triggering kernel panic).
Why the OOM killer cannot respond with "I need to kill a different victim"
than "ignore and silently hang up" ? Doing so with bounded wait is trivial
and also helps "Whenever we select a victim and call mark_oom_victim
we hope it will eventually get out of its kernel code path" problem.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-14 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-14 10:56 [PATCH] mm,oom_reaper: Use try_oom_reaper() for reapability test Tetsuo Handa
2016-04-14 10:56 ` [PATCH] mm,oom: Clarify reason to kill other threads sharing the vitctim's memory Tetsuo Handa
2016-04-14 11:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 15:03 ` [PATCH] mm,oom: Clarify reason to kill other threads sharing thevitctim's memory Tetsuo Handa
2016-04-14 15:18 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 21:59 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2016-04-14 11:21 ` [PATCH] mm,oom_reaper: Use try_oom_reaper() for reapability test Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 11:34 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-04-14 12:01 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 12:34 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-14 14:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-04-14 14:30 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-15 12:11 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201604150659.BFI12469.tHLSOFMOJFQVFO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox