linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] mm/slab: fix the theoretical race by holding proper lock
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:56:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160414015640.GB9198@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1604121137470.14315@east.gentwo.org>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38:39AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > @@ -2222,6 +2241,7 @@ static void drain_cpu_caches(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> >  {
> >  	struct kmem_cache_node *n;
> >  	int node;
> > +	LIST_HEAD(list);
> >
> >  	on_each_cpu(do_drain, cachep, 1);
> >  	check_irq_on();
> > @@ -2229,8 +2249,13 @@ static void drain_cpu_caches(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> >  		if (n->alien)
> >  			drain_alien_cache(cachep, n->alien);
> >
> > -	for_each_kmem_cache_node(cachep, node, n)
> > -		drain_array(cachep, n, n->shared, 1, node);
> > +	for_each_kmem_cache_node(cachep, node, n) {
> > +		spin_lock_irq(&n->list_lock);
> > +		drain_array_locked(cachep, n->shared, node, true, &list);
> > +		spin_unlock_irq(&n->list_lock);
> > +
> > +		slabs_destroy(cachep, &list);
> 
> Can the slabs_destroy() call be moved outside of the loop? It may be
> faster then?

Yes, it can. But, I'd prefer to call it on each node. It would be
better for cache although it would be marginal.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12  4:50 [PATCH v2 00/11] mm/slab: reduce lock contention in alloc path js1304
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] mm/slab: fix the theoretical race by holding proper lock js1304
2016-04-12 16:38   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-14  1:56     ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] mm/slab: remove BAD_ALIEN_MAGIC again js1304
2016-04-12 16:41   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] mm/slab: drain the free slab as much as possible js1304
2016-04-12  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] mm/slab: factor out kmem_cache_node initialization code js1304
2016-04-12 16:53   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-26  0:47   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] mm/slab: clean-up kmem_cache_node setup js1304
2016-04-12 16:55   ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] mm/slab: don't keep free slabs if free_objects exceeds free_limit js1304
2016-07-22 11:51   ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-07-26  7:18     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mm/slab: racy access/modify the slab color js1304
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] mm/slab: make cache_grow() handle the page allocated on arbitrary node js1304
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] mm/slab: separate cache_grow() to two parts js1304
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] mm/slab: refill cpu cache through a new slab without holding a node lock js1304
2016-04-12  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] mm/slab: lockless decision to grow cache js1304
2016-04-12  7:24   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-04-12  8:16     ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160414015640.GB9198@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox