linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] oom-clear-tif_memdie-after-oom_reaper-managed-to-unmap-the-address-space-fix
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:21:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201603100721.CDC86433.OMFOVOHSJFLFQt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160309132142.80d0afbf0ae398df8e2adba8@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> I found the below patch lying around but I didn't queue it properly. 
> Is it legit?

I think that patch wants patch description updated.
Not testing pure noise, but causing possible livelock.
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160217143917.GP29196@dhcp22.suse.cz

> 
> 
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Subject: oom-clear-tif_memdie-after-oom_reaper-managed-to-unmap-the-address-space-fix
> 
> When the OOM killer scans tasks and encounters a PF_EXITING one, it
> force-selects that one regardless of the score. Is there a possibility
> that the task might hang after it has set PF_EXITING? In that case the
> OOM killer should be able to move on to the next task.
> 
> Frankly, I don't even know why we check for exiting tasks in the OOM
> killer. We've tried direct reclaim at least 15 times by the time we
> decide the system is OOM, there was plenty of time to exit and free
> memory; and a task might exit voluntarily right after we issue a kill.
> This is testing pure noise.
> 
> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: Andrea Argangeli <andrea@kernel.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> 
>  mm/oom_kill.c |    3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN mm/oom_kill.c~oom-clear-tif_memdie-after-oom_reaper-managed-to-unmap-the-address-space-fix mm/oom_kill.c
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c~oom-clear-tif_memdie-after-oom_reaper-managed-to-unmap-the-address-space-fix
> +++ a/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -292,9 +292,6 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(
>  	if (oom_task_origin(task))
>  		return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
>  
> -	if (task_will_free_mem(task) && !is_sysrq_oom(oc))
> -		return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
> -
>  	return OOM_SCAN_OK;
>  }
>  
> _
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-09 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 13:12 [PATCH -mm 0/2] oom_reaper: missing parts Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm-oom_reaper-report-success-failure-fix-fix Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] oom-clear-tif_memdie-after-oom_reaper-managed-to-unmap-the-address-space-fix Michal Hocko
2016-03-09 21:21   ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-09 22:21     ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2016-03-09 22:48       ` Johannes Weiner
2016-03-09 23:08         ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-10  0:45           ` Johannes Weiner
2016-03-10 11:17             ` [PATCH 2/2]oom-clear-tif_memdie-after-oom_reaper-managed-to-unmap-the-address-space-fix Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-09 22:30     ` [PATCH 2/2] oom-clear-tif_memdie-after-oom_reaper-managed-to-unmap-the-address-space-fix Johannes Weiner
2016-03-08 13:18 ` [PATCH -mm 0/2] oom_reaper: missing parts Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201603100721.CDC86433.OMFOVOHSJFLFQt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox