From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75C66B0256 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:06:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b205so3561064wmb.1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:06:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from gum.cmpxchg.org (gum.cmpxchg.org. [85.214.110.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v71si41056719wmd.18.2016.02.23.10.06.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:06:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:06:54 -0800 From: Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim Message-ID: <20160223180654.GB13816@cmpxchg.org> References: <1456239890-20737-1-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <1456239890-20737-3-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456239890-20737-3-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Linux-MM , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , LKML On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:04:25PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check. > The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim > path which is expensive but there is no harm is doing it. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Johannes Weiner -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org